Education should be accessible to people of all economic backgrounds. All levels of education from primary school to tertiary education should be free. To what extent do you agree with this opinion. v.6
Education should be accessible to people of all economic backgrounds. All levels of education from primary school to tertiary education should be free. v. 6
The need for educating people from elementary level to the tertiary has caused a clamour for free education at those levels. This is particularly important because not everyone, although bearing a part of the country' s future, can access it. While I agree it is important that everyone is educated, I disagree that every level should not be paid for.
Looking at the fast decaying nature of some developing countries' economy, we may start wondering why the rich, who surely could pay for the fees of their children, cannot promise a sustainable positive development. This is why everyone should be educated. It is noteworthy that people from the rich homes have been attributed to low success stories in the academic world. Both the well to do and below poverty level need equal opportunities to create change. In other words, making education accessible to everyone might just be opening doors to the next world changer.
Even when this is done, there is need to still regulate what people can receive for free. Unpaid services have been looked down upon in many cases, meaning people' s attachment naturally falls for whatever they had made a commitment for. For instance, many schoolers play truancy because they are receiving free education from the government. If they had paid for it, their seriousness would have been recorded in a large scale. Therefore, some levels of education, like what is received at the universities, should be paid for.
In conclusion, the doors to equal education should be opened to every citizen of a country. Nevertheless, some levels need the learner' s direct financial involvements in order that keen interest is ignited.
The
need
for educating
people
from elementary
level
to the tertiary has caused a
clamour
for free
education
at those
levels
. This is
particularly
important
because
not
everyone
, although bearing a part of the
country&
#039; s future, can access it. While I
agree
it is
important
that
everyone
is educated
, I disagree that every
level
should not
be paid
for.
Looking at the
fast
decaying nature of
some
developing
countries&
#039; economy, we may
start
wondering why the rich, who
surely
could pay for the fees of their children, cannot promise a sustainable
positive
development. This is why
everyone
should
be educated
. It is noteworthy that
people
from the rich homes have
been attributed
to low success stories in the academic world. Both the
well to do
and below poverty
level
need
equal opportunities to create
change
.
In other words
, making
education
accessible to
everyone
might
just
be opening doors to the
next
world changer.
Even when this
is done
, there is
need
to
still
regulate what
people
can receive for free. Unpaid services have
been looked
down upon in
many
cases, meaning
people&
#039; s attachment
naturally
falls for whatever they had made a commitment for.
For instance
,
many
schoolers play truancy
because
they are receiving free
education
from the
government
. If they had paid for it, their seriousness would have
been recorded
in a large scale.
Therefore
,
some
levels
of
education
, like what
is received
at the universities, should
be paid
for.
In conclusion
, the doors to equal
education
should
be opened
to every citizen of a country.
Nevertheless
,
some
levels
need
the
learner&
#039; s direct financial involvements in order that keen interest
is ignited
.
14Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
23Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6Mistakes