Thin is in, in America. Not only fashion magazines, but also doctors proclaim the importance of a slim, healthy body. Yet despite the current obsession with the trim, taut and terrific body, Americans are putting on weight. In studies conducted in 1980, one quarter of Americans were found to be overweight. Fifteen years later, that number had risen to one third of the population.
In the past, doctors have always recommended a combination of diet and exercise to combat obesity. With the increase in the number of people who are overweight, however, this solution is increasingly being seen to be ineffective.
Given that diet and exercise often do not help produce weight loss, scientists are becoming convinced that, for many, obesity is a genetic disorder. In 1994 a research group at Rockefeller University discovered in experiments on mice what is now called the obesity, or "ob" gene. In turn this discovery led to the identification of a hormone, termed leptin, that signals to the brain the amount of fat stored in the body. When injected into the rodents, the hormone reduced appetite and increased the body's utilisation of calories, the energy produced by food which the body may convert to fat. With findings like these, a large number of medical experts are turning to a selection of drugs which appear to be safe and effective in reducing weight and maintaining lower weight levels.
Because they see obesity as an illness, these authorities claim that treatment should involve not only diet and exercise but drugs as well. What they have in mind is not just a short course of medication to produce small degrees of weight loss. They want to prescribe long-term, perhaps lifetime, drug therapies, just as they might for high blood pressure or diabetes. Obesity's victims, these doctors hope, will not only be able to lose weight, but will also keep that weight off forever.
Not everyone in the medical community is satisfied with the new therapies. Conservatives are seriously worried that the new drugs are, in fact, merely placebos ("medicines" that have no medical effect but may benefit the patient psychologically), or, worse, are actually detrimental to patients' health. Their concerns are understandable. A few decades ago amphetamines - nicknamed "uppers" or "speed" - were widely prescribed to control weight. Patients became slimmer, but suffered from tension and irritability, high pulse rates, and sleepless nights, side effects that may have outweighed the medical benefits of lower body weight. Conservatives also point out that risky as amphetamines were, they were generally prescribed only for temporary use. Advocates of new drug treatments leave open the possibility that the medications will be prescribed for a lifetime.
While there are at least 5 new diet drugs waiting approval by the us Drug and Food Administration, at the moment, the only diet medication that is normally used in the US is "fen-phen", a combination of the drugs fenfluramine and phentermine. Fenfluramine boosts serotonin, which elevates mood, while phentermine mimics other substances in the brain. Together, the drugs suppress appetite and increase the rate of burning of calories. As its success becomes more widely known, demand for this medication is increasing. Prescriptions for fenfluramine in 1995 were expected to be four times what they were the previous year.
For several reasons, however, fen-phen is not the perfect diet medication. First, there is some debate over safety, although most fen-phen researchers say the drugs pose minor health risks compared with amphetamines. For most patients the short-term side effects are negligible; phentermine heightens alertness while persuading the body to burn more calories, and fenfluramine, thought to cut cravings for starches and sweets, can cause drowsiness. But some users experience a racing heartbeat and, although rarely, high blood pressure. While its effects are milder than those of amphetamines, the feeling of higher energy that fen-phen stirs can be habit-forming. Used alone, phentermine has enough kick to appeal to recreational drug users, who call it "bumblebee". Perhaps even more importantly for dieters, while the drug may cause initial weight loss, over a period of several years, subjects taking the drugs tended to regain some of the weight they had lost - although at a slower rate than those who did not take fen-phen.
Many conservative doctors, moreover, still remain reluctant to diagnose obesity as a disease. In a 19814 survey of 318 physicians, two thirds said their obese patients lacked self-control, and 39% described them as lazy. This traditional view holds that obesity results from a lack of discipline, correctable by diet and exercise. Since studies show that most dieters eat more than they say - or even think - they do, there is probably some truth in seeing a much simpler cause.
On the other hand, the traditional view is challenged by the discovery of the ob gene, which would seem to place significant weight loss outside the individual's control. Then there is the problem of the ever-increasing numbers of obese people, with the resulting increase in hypertension, and diabetes, leading to kidney failure and heart disease. All of these conditions require medication, if not costly equipment and surgery. If all of these effects of obesity must be treated with medication, why refuse medical treatment to help control body weight? Is not prevention better than a cure?
Thin is in, in America. Not
only
fashion magazines,
but
also
doctors
proclaim the importance of a slim, healthy
body
.
Yet
despite the
current
obsession with the trim, taut and terrific
body
, Americans are putting on
weight
. In studies conducted in 1980, one quarter of Americans
were found
to be overweight. Fifteen years later, that
number
had risen to one third of the population.
In the past,
doctors
have always recommended a combination of diet and
exercise
to combat obesity. With the increase in the
number
of
people
who are overweight,
however
, this solution is
increasingly
being
seen
to be ineffective.
Given
that diet and
exercise
often
do not
help
produce
weight
loss
, scientists are becoming convinced that, for
many
, obesity is a genetic disorder. In 1994 a research group at Rockefeller University discovered in experiments on mice what is
now
called the obesity, or
"
ob
"
gene. In turn this discovery led to the identification of a hormone, termed leptin, that signals to the brain the amount of
fat
stored in the
body
. When injected into the rodents, the hormone
reduced
appetite and increased the body's
utilisation
of calories, the energy produced by food which the
body
may convert to
fat
. With findings like these, a large
number
of
medical
experts are turning to a selection of
drugs
which appear to be safe and effective in reducing
weight
and maintaining lower
weight
levels.
Because
they
see
obesity as an illness, these authorities claim that treatment should involve not
only
diet and
exercise
but
drugs
as well
. What they have in mind is not
just
a short course of
medication
to produce
small
degrees of
weight
loss
. They want to prescribe long-term, perhaps lifetime,
drug
therapies,
just
as they might for high blood pressure or diabetes. Obesity's victims, these
doctors
hope, will not
only
be able to lose
weight
,
but
will
also
keep
that
weight
off forever.
Not everyone in the
medical
community
is satisfied
with the
new
therapies. Conservatives are
seriously
worried that the
new
drugs
are, in fact,
merely
placebos (
"
medicines
"
that have no
medical
effect
but
may benefit the
patient
psychologically
), or, worse, are actually detrimental to patients' health. Their concerns are understandable. A few decades ago
amphetamines
-
nicknamed
"
uppers
"
or
"
speed
"
-
were
widely
prescribed to control
weight
.
Patients
became slimmer,
but
suffered from tension and irritability, high pulse rates, and sleepless nights, side effects that may have outweighed the
medical
benefits of lower
body
weight
. Conservatives
also
point out that risky as
amphetamines
were, they were
generally
prescribed
only
for temporary
use
. Advocates of
new
drug
treatments
leave
open the possibility that the medications will
be prescribed
for a lifetime.
While there are at least 5
new
diet
drugs
waiting approval by
the us
Drug
and Food Administration, at the moment, the
only
diet
medication
that is
normally
used
in the US is
"
fen-phen
"
, a combination of the
drugs
fenfluramine
and
phentermine
.
Fenfluramine
boosts serotonin, which elevates mood, while
phentermine
mimics other substances in the brain. Together, the
drugs
suppress appetite and increase the rate of burning of calories. As its success becomes more
widely
known, demand for this
medication
is increasing. Prescriptions for
fenfluramine
in 1995 were
expected
to be four times what they were the previous year.
For several reasons,
however
,
fen-phen
is not the perfect diet
medication
.
First
, there is
some
debate over safety, although most
fen-phen
researchers say the
drugs
pose minor health
risks
compared with
amphetamines
. For most
patients
the short-term side effects are negligible;
phentermine
heightens alertness while persuading the
body
to burn more calories, and
fenfluramine
,
thought
to
cut
cravings for starches and sweets, can cause drowsiness.
But
some
users experience a racing heartbeat and, although rarely, high blood pressure. While its effects are milder than those of
amphetamines
, the feeling of higher energy that
fen-phen
stirs can be habit-forming.
Used
alone,
phentermine
has
enough
kick to appeal to recreational
drug
users, who call it
"
bumblebee
"
. Perhaps even more
importantly
for dieters, while the
drug
may cause initial
weight
loss
, over a period of several years, subjects taking the
drugs
tended to regain
some of the
weight
they had lost
-
although at a slower rate than those who did not take
fen-phen
.
Many
conservative
doctors
,
moreover
,
still
remain reluctant to diagnose obesity as a disease. In a 19814 survey of 318 physicians, two thirds said their obese
patients
lacked self-control, and 39%
described
them as lazy. This traditional view holds that obesity results from a lack of discipline, correctable by diet and
exercise
. Since studies
show
that most dieters eat more than they say
-
or even
think
-
they do, there is
probably
some
truth in seeing a much simpler cause.
On the other hand
, the traditional view
is challenged
by the discovery of the ob gene, which would seem to place significant
weight
loss
outside the individual's control. Then there is the problem of the ever-increasing
numbers
of obese
people
, with the resulting increase in hypertension, and diabetes, leading to kidney failure and heart disease. All of these conditions require
medication
, if not costly equipment and surgery. If all of these effects of obesity
must
be treated
with
medication
, why refuse
medical
treatment to
help
control
body
weight
? Is not prevention better than a cure?