Some feel farming vegetables and taking care of animals should be added to the primary school curriculum. In my opinion, though there are drawbacks related to its feasibility, it would be a positive overall. The disadvantages involve the struggles to implement this practice. Firstly, inner city schools do not have easy access to farms. A school in New York City already faced with rising student numbers and a lack of resources cannot be expected to bus thousands of students to nearby farmland on a regular basis. That would unequivocally be a poor allocation of limited resources. Secondly, even schools located in the countryside would have trouble enacting such an ambitious policy. They would need to connect with possibly reluctant local farms, convince teachers, parents, and students of the benefits, and divert funding towards a program with dubious 21st century value as society becomes increasingly urban and less agrarian. Nonetheless, the skills learned would be transferrable and beneficial in themselves. Children learning to grow vegetables will be able to do that their entire lives and much more inclined to later tend a private garden. This can save money, encourage productivity, and improve health. Taking care of animals will also help them if they choose to keep livestock or pets. The greater benefit, however, will come from cultivation of personal qualities. Children will gain a greater sense of responsibility and internalise the real world effects of their negligence or dedication.
Later in life regardless of their occupation and where they live, they will have increased self-reliance and a stronger recognition of how they can shape the world around them. In conclusion, the personal benefits to raising animals and growing vegetables outweigh any perceived drawbacks concerning resources. Where possible, schools ought to enact these changes.
Some
feel farming vegetables and taking care of animals should be
added
to the primary
school
curriculum. In my opinion, though there are drawbacks related to its feasibility, it would be a
positive
overall
. The disadvantages involve the struggles to implement this practice.
Firstly
, inner city
schools
do not have easy access to farms. A
school
in New York City already faced with rising student numbers and a lack of resources cannot be
expected
to bus thousands of students to nearby farmland on a regular basis. That would
unequivocally
be a poor allocation of limited resources.
Secondly
, even
schools
located in the countryside would have trouble enacting such an ambitious policy. They would need to connect with
possibly
reluctant local farms, convince teachers, parents, and students of the benefits, and divert funding towards a program with dubious 21st century value as society becomes
increasingly
urban and less agrarian. Nonetheless, the
skills
learned would be
transferrable
and beneficial in themselves. Children learning to grow vegetables will be able to do that their entire
lives
and much more inclined to later tend a private garden. This can save money, encourage productivity, and
improve
health. Taking care of animals will
also
help
them if they choose to
keep
livestock or pets. The greater benefit,
however
, will
come
from cultivation of personal qualities. Children will gain a greater sense of responsibility and
internalise
the real world effects of their negligence or dedication.
Later in life regardless of their occupation and where they
live
, they will have increased self-reliance and a stronger recognition of how they can shape the world around them.
In conclusion
, the personal benefits to raising animals and growing vegetables outweigh any perceived drawbacks concerning resources. Where possible,
schools
ought to enact these
changes
.