Giving money to those in need can be a personally satisfying experience, but there is a choice between donating nationally and internationally through charities or giving directly to those around you. This essay will consider the merits of both approaches.
The first advantage of providing direct support is that you can know exactly how your money is being spent. For example, if you give money directly to people in your local village or town, you can see where it has gone. When you donate to larger charitable organisations, on the other hand, you are not sure how much will actually be given to those in need as opposed going on other costs such as administration and expensive marketing campaigns. Another benefit is that you can see the impacts on those you are helping, which can lead not only to great personal satisfaction but also to respect from others in the local community who appreciate the work you do.
There are advantages, however, in giving to charities that are national and international. First and foremost there is the choice of good causes. Locally the kinds of places to help may be limited, but in larger organisations you can get involved in such activities as sponsoring a child or conserving wildlife. Not only this, donating to larger charities with an international reach means having the knowledge that you are involved in issues of fundamental global importance, such as curing diseases and human rights, or helping those caught up in tragic environmental events, such as flooding, earthquakes and famines. In conclusion, given the benefits of both, I would argue that an individual should make their own choice based on their personal preferences and whichever provides them with the most personal satisfaction. What is crucial is that we continue to give to those who are more in need than ourselves.
Giving money to those in need can be a
personally
satisfying experience,
but
there is a choice between donating
nationally
and
internationally
through charities or giving
directly
to those around you. This essay will consider the merits of both approaches.
The
first
advantage of providing direct support is that you can know exactly how your money is
being spent
.
For example
, if you give money
directly
to
people
in your local village or town, you can
see
where it has gone. When you donate to larger charitable
organisations
,
on the other hand
, you are not sure how much will actually be
given
to those in need as opposed going on other costs such as administration and expensive marketing campaigns. Another benefit is that you can
see
the impacts on those you are helping, which can lead not
only
to great personal satisfaction
but
also
to respect from others in the local community who appreciate the work you do.
There are advantages,
however
, in giving to charities that are national and international.
First
and foremost there is the choice of
good
causes.
Locally
the kinds of places to
help
may
be limited
,
but
in larger
organisations
you can
get
involved in such activities as sponsoring a child or conserving wildlife. Not
only
this, donating to larger charities with an international reach means having the knowledge that you
are involved
in issues of fundamental global importance, such as curing diseases and human rights, or helping those caught up in tragic environmental
events
, such as flooding, earthquakes and famines.
In conclusion
,
given
the benefits of both, I would argue that an individual should
make
their
own
choice based on their personal preferences and whichever provides them with the most personal satisfaction. What is crucial is that we continue to give to those who are more in need than ourselves.