People hold different views about whether international sport occasions would stop or not. While I accept that these events have some unfavorable features aspects, I contend with the view that they play crucial rules and they, therefore, should continue.
On the one hand, I agree with the opinion of the view that worldwide sport events have negative features. The main justification is that environmental problems are caused by events such as Olympic Games. Some visitors, who lack of awareness may litter, lead to the environment pollutions. Moreover, their movements are fuel-consuming and release dirty smoke into the atmosphere. It is also undeniable that in this day and age, when the pandemic has tendency to spread out, large crowds exert negative impacts on health protection. For example, If a spectator are contracted with Sars Cov 2, the others who contacted with him at the stadium could run the high risk of getting that serious disease, making themselves exhausted and fatiguied.
On the other hand, I provoke the idea that international sport events bring a myriad of benefits. When a country wins a world championship, its profile will absolutely be enhanced on the international scale and it will become better-known all over the world, tourism-attracting and investment-seeking. This can create the flourishing economy, which benefits individuals, produce products and services to meet our ever-increasing demand as well as bring more job opportunities. empowering individuals to earn a living. Furthermore, the winning makes their residents instill national pride, ethnic dignity as well as foster a sense of belonging and facilitate social unity.
In condusion, although I opine that international sport occasions pose potential threats to our life, it seems to me that they should be continually taken place.
People
hold
different
views about whether
international
sport
occasions would
stop
or not. While I accept that these
events
have
some
unfavorable features aspects, I contend with the view that they play crucial
rules and
they,
therefore
, should continue.
On the one hand, I
agree
with the opinion of the view that worldwide
sport
events
have
negative
features. The main justification is that environmental problems
are caused
by
events
such as Olympic Games.
Some
visitors, who lack of awareness may litter, lead to the environment pollutions.
Moreover
, their movements are fuel-consuming and release dirty smoke into the atmosphere. It is
also
undeniable that in this day and age, when the pandemic has tendency to spread out, large crowds exert
negative
impacts on health protection.
For example
, If a spectator
are contracted
with
Sars
Cov
2, the others who contacted with him at the stadium could run the high
risk
of getting that serious disease, making themselves exhausted and
fatiguied
.
On the other hand
, I provoke the
idea
that
international
sport
events
bring a myriad of benefits. When a country wins a world championship, its profile will
absolutely
be enhanced
on the
international
scale and it will become better-known all over the world, tourism-attracting and investment-seeking. This can create the flourishing economy, which benefits individuals, produce products and services to
meet
our ever-increasing demand
as well
as bring more job opportunities.
empowering
individuals to earn a living.
Furthermore
, the winning
makes
their residents instill national pride, ethnic dignity
as well
as foster a sense of belonging and facilitate social unity.
In
condusion
, although I opine that
international
sport
occasions pose potential threats to our life, it seems to me that they should be
continually
taken place.