In today’s competitive world, leading has been counting a tedious and challenging job. A top-notch leader is one who makes the most profitable decision in various circumstances. A forerunner possesses a variety of qualities ranging from humility to honesty. Although it is opined by some that the more quickly a leader makes a decision, the more successful will be, this essay is trying to refute this notion. Throughout the following paragraphs, among the most predominant reasons in support of this contention heightening the accuracy and becoming aware of alternative solutions will be meticulously scrutinized to advocate this standpoint that if a chief is not fast in making the decision, he will not be seen as ineffective to the people who lead.
To commence with, in most cases there is a trade-off between speed-accuracy. An erudite boss should weigh the advantages and downsides of the matter from a different lens. It is obvious that faster decisions are more likely to encounter flaws, so a knowledgeable chief must precisely investigate the cons and pros of a viewpoint before making a result. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what has elaborated above. Here, I depict one of my own experiences. When I was working in the Harvard Lab. , the dean asked me to offer advice to boost the internet’s infrastructure, because I was a computer whiz, on the spur of the moment I gave an opinion that not only needed much more time and cost but also there were diverse possible solutions with lower cost. Accordingly, in most of the hectic situations and academic cases, it takes time to reach the best choices.
Furthermore, time passing helps a leader to face with other alternative approaches and different windows of opportunities. Undoubtedly, the initial solution is not the best solution and the chief should hold meetings to be acquainted with other possible viewpoints. To more clarify the condition, I mention the outcome of one survey conducted at Harvard School to probe the impact of the time passing on students’ decisions. Over 85% of the participants believed that throughout the time they readily overcome their stresses and after scrutiny, they depict the best answer. Therefore, not only time passing helps to relieve the tension but also it supports us to meet other postulates that become tangible toward the end of the deadlines.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that it is true that being fast has been counted as an outstanding trait but there are more benefits for leaders to make decisions throughout time and also, there is a conflict between being fast and effective.
In
today
’s competitive world, leading has been counting a tedious and challenging job. A top-notch
leader
is one who
makes
the most profitable
decision
in various circumstances. A forerunner possesses a variety of qualities ranging from humility to honesty. Although it
is opined
by
some
that the more
quickly
a
leader
makes
a
decision
, the more successful will be, this essay is trying to refute this notion. Throughout the following paragraphs, among the most predominant reasons in support of this contention heightening the accuracy and becoming aware of alternative
solutions
will be
meticulously
scrutinized to advocate this standpoint that if a chief is not
fast
in making the
decision
, he will not be
seen
as ineffective to the
people
who lead.
To commence with,
in most cases
there is a trade-off between speed-accuracy. An erudite boss should weigh the advantages and downsides of the matter from a
different
lens. It is obvious that faster
decisions
are more likely to encounter flaws,
so
a knowledgeable chief
must
precisely
investigate the cons and pros of a viewpoint
before
making a result. A vivid example can be
given
to shed light on what has elaborated above. Here, I depict one of my
own
experiences.
When
I was working in the Harvard Lab.
,
the dean asked me to offer advice to boost the internet’s infrastructure,
because
I was a computer whiz, on the spur of the moment I gave an opinion that not
only
needed much more
time
and cost
but
also
there were diverse possible
solutions
with lower cost.
Accordingly
, in most of the hectic situations and academic cases, it takes
time
to reach the best choices.
Furthermore
,
time
passing
helps
a
leader
to face with other alternative approaches and
different
windows of opportunities.
Undoubtedly
, the initial
solution
is not the best
solution
and the chief should hold meetings to
be acquainted
with other possible viewpoints. To more clarify the condition, I mention the outcome of one survey conducted at Harvard School to probe the impact of the
time
passing on students’
decisions
. Over 85% of the participants believed that throughout the
time
they
readily
overcome their
stresses
and after scrutiny, they depict the best answer.
Therefore
, not
only
time
passing
helps
to relieve the tension
but
also
it supports us to
meet
other postulates that become tangible toward the
end
of the deadlines.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that it is true that being
fast
has
been counted
as an outstanding trait
but
there are more benefits for
leaders
to
make
decisions
throughout
time
and
also
, there is a conflict between being
fast
and effective.