Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should support artists rather than allow them to support themselves. v.424

The government should support artists rather than allow them to support themselves. v. 424
It' s a common impression among people that most artists live a difficult life. They' ve given tremendous time and efforts just in order to compose a masterpiece. However, not so many people are able to appreciate ttheir work, and even few people could afford and willing to buy them. Owing to this fact, I would like to agree that the government should support artists. I would like to address several reasons to substantiate my view. As I mentioned above, artists always devote themselves into their works. However, they recieve much less realistic feedbacks compared to what they' ve sacrificed. My art teacher in elementary school used to be an painter. He often thought really hard, like brain-storming, and spent a lot of time in composing a picture. As a result, his work was really inspiring and extraordinary. Yet it seemed like nobody was able to appreciate his work. As he could only made ends meet, he eventually gave up the life as an painter and turned to teach children art. If government was able to suppport them, perhaps things won' t go out in that way and we were still able to see his new, beautiful work now. Some people may claim that there is no reason for government to spend money on protecting artists because artists are not really a necessary job in the society. Nevertheless, I have to argue that art is so important and it often affects us in a invisible way. Art is a part of our education. We teach children to compose or appreciate art works because we now live in a advanced society where there are still something people persue beyond food and security. The existence of artists can let us view the world with a artistic value. A company can atcually benefit from artists too. For example, a furniture company can sell products that is both well functional and elegant in looking. The latter trait would rely a lot on a artist. And as our society is able to appreciate art, this product would sell well. To conclude, artists are indespensible to the society and their contribution are huge although people often neglect it. Owing to these facts, government should take some measures to support the artists in order to let their society thrive.
It&
#039; s a common impression among
people
that most
artists
live
a difficult life.
They&
#039; ve
given
tremendous time and efforts
just
in order to compose a masterpiece.
However
, not
so
many
people
are
able
to
appreciate
ttheir
work
, and even few
people
could afford and willing to
buy
them. Owing to this fact, I would like to
agree
that the
government
should support
artists
. I would like to address several reasons to substantiate my view.

As I mentioned above,
artists
always devote themselves into their works.
However
, they
recieve
much less realistic feedbacks compared to what
they&
#039; ve sacrificed. My
art
teacher in elementary school
used
to be
an
painter. He
often
thought
really
hard
, like brain-storming, and spent
a lot of
time in composing a picture.
As a result
, his
work
was
really
inspiring and extraordinary.
Yet
it seemed like nobody was
able
to
appreciate
his
work
. As he could
only
made ends
meet
, he
eventually
gave up the life as
an
painter and turned to teach children
art
. If
government
was
able
to
suppport
them, perhaps things
won&
#039; t go out in that
way and
we were
still
able
to
see
his new,
beautiful
work
now
.

Some
people
may claim that there is no reason for
government
to spend money on protecting
artists
because
artists
are not
really
a necessary job in the
society
.
Nevertheless
, I
have to
argue that
art
is
so
important
and it
often
affects us
in a invisible way
.
Art
is a part of our education. We teach children to compose or
appreciate
art
works
because
we
now
live
in
a
advanced
society
where there are
still
something
people
persue
beyond food and security.

The existence of
artists
can
let
us view the world with
a
artistic value. A
company
can
atcually
benefit from
artists
too.
For example
, a furniture
company
can sell products
that is
both well functional and elegant in looking. The latter trait would rely a lot on
a
artist
. And as our
society
is
able
to
appreciate
art
, this product would sell well.

To conclude
,
artists
are
indespensible
to the
society
and their contribution are huge although
people
often
neglect it. Owing to these facts,
government
should take
some
measures to support the
artists
in order to
let
their
society
thrive.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
44Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
17Mistakes

IELTS essay The government should support artists rather than allow them to support themselves. v. 424

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
382 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts