Transportation is vital in almost all types of society. Purchasing one’s private vehicle is highly commendable, particularly in this generation. However, in order to legally drive such, one must first take a driving examination to acquire a license. In this regards, an assumption that drivers' skills must be compulsory reassessed every half a decade is generated. My conviction dictates that boons and banes of the suggested reassessment are existential.
The idea of undergoing drive test before releasing a license is brilliant. Although as of the moment, the majority of the countries provide one-time drive exam, but transforming it into every 5 years, can deliver a ripple of benefits. One of it is that only competent drivers who have proved it through a series of actual driving examinations can freely operate their vehicles on the road. Furthermore, these licensed operators know not just to manipulate vehicles, but likewise all the traffic rules. Road violations, overtaking on yellow lane, not stopping on pedestrian lane, not adhering the traffic lights, to name a few, are eradicated if people get their driving permit before hand. Certain individuals can be more confident that highway accidents are lessened. Overall, episodes of evaluating the knowledge and skills of drivers can help achieve a zero vehicular predicament in every community.
On the other hand, drawbacks of frequent driving evaluation are as well unavoided. Primarily, an extra time and effort is necessary to facilitate re-evaluation. Most of the people in this fast-faced world can barely make a time for this, so they need to sacrifice a day on their schools or work to do such. Aside from that, a budget for the road skills test every after a couple of years must be included in the savings too as nothing can be free. This could contribute additional financial worries particularly on people who are not well-off. An epitome of this is an independent working student who study by day and work by night to finance his/herself. Unfortunately, he/she needed to be absent on his classes and work to process the retake of the driving test. Substantially, compulsory driving skill reassessments every half a decade require time, effort and money.
As a denouement, the concept of obligatory re-evaluation of road skills every 5 years possessed equally optimistic and pessimistic consequences. The members of sovereignty must do a deliberate research, as well as, trial-and-error before finally executing. If they can provide financial assistance or at least make the processing fee economical, then the struggles will be minimized. At the end of the day, everyone in a community wants and deserves an accident-free sanctuary.
Transportation is vital in almost all types of society. Purchasing one’s private vehicle is
highly
commendable,
particularly
in this generation.
However
, in order to
legally
drive such, one
must
first
take a
driving
examination to acquire a license. In
this
regards, an assumption that drivers'
skills
must
be compulsory reassessed every half a decade
is generated
. My conviction dictates that boons and banes of the suggested reassessment are existential.
The
idea
of undergoing drive
test
before
releasing a license is brilliant. Although as of the moment, the majority of the countries provide one-time drive exam,
but
transforming it into every 5 years, can deliver a ripple of benefits. One of it is that
only
competent drivers who have proved it through a series of actual
driving
examinations can
freely
operate their vehicles on the
road
.
Furthermore
, these licensed operators know not
just
to manipulate vehicles,
but
likewise
all the traffic
rules
.
Road
violations, overtaking on yellow lane, not stopping on pedestrian lane, not adhering the traffic lights, to name a few,
are eradicated
if
people
get
their
driving
permit
before hand
. Certain individuals can be more confident that highway accidents
are lessened
.
Overall
, episodes of evaluating the knowledge and
skills
of drivers can
help
achieve a zero vehicular predicament in every community.
On the other hand
, drawbacks of frequent
driving
evaluation are
as well
unavoided
.
Primarily
, an extra time and effort is necessary to facilitate re-evaluation. Most of the
people
in this
fast
-faced world can
barely
make
a time for this,
so
they need to sacrifice a day on their schools or work to do such. Aside from that, a budget for the
road
skills
test
every after a couple of years
must
be included
in the savings too as nothing can be free. This could contribute additional financial worries
particularly
on
people
who are not well-off. An epitome of this is an independent working student who study by day and work by night to finance his/herself. Unfortunately, he/she needed to be absent on his classes and work to process the retake of the
driving
test
.
Substantially
, compulsory
driving
skill
reassessments every half a decade require time, effort and money.
As a
denouement
, the concept of obligatory re-evaluation of
road
skills
every 5 years possessed
equally
optimistic and pessimistic consequences. The members of sovereignty
must
do a deliberate research,
as well
as, trial-and-error
before
finally
executing. If they can provide financial assistance or at least
make
the processing fee economical, then the struggles will
be minimized
. At the
end
of the day, everyone in a community wants and deserves an accident-free sanctuary.