The most pressing problems in the world nowadays is environmental damage. When it comes to tackle the problems, people think that government should raise the cost of fuel, however, it is not the only solution to address the environmental problems. This essay will take a closer look at the side view.
First of all, the increase in fuel cost is able to reduce the commodity consumptions. It directly discourages the utilization and promotes the popularity of public transportations, and the carbon dioxide emissions released into the air are lessened and it impedes the process of air pollution and global warming. For example, if the gasoline is more expensive, people tend to take the bus or train rather than their own cars. Besides, it should be improved the efficiency of house appliances such as air conditioning, heating, cooking and so on, while the government could pass laws to limit the emissions from manufacturing generations. For example, people are able to switch to energy-efficient lighting instead of normal lighting.
Raising the cost of fossil fuel may lead to hassle living conditions for people who live in poverty-stricken countries. The higher tax on fuel is proportionate to higher production cost, which depends on machines operated by fossil fuel, therefore the inhabitants may struggle with more expensive goods. By investing more in alternative energies for sustainable growth, I believe that the government can play a paramount in addressing the environmental problems, and I would argue that the best solution is to educate people with their awareness of our daily energy use to minimize the carbon dioxide emissions.
Taking everything into consideration, since environmental damage is a global issue and increase the price of fuel is a short-term solution to address the environmental problems, as individuals we are able to contribute by taking steps to reduce our carbon dioxide emissions.
The most pressing
problems
in the world nowadays is
environmental
damage. When it
comes
to tackle the
problems
,
people
think
that
government
should raise the
cost
of
fuel
,
however
, it is not the
only
solution to address the
environmental
problems
. This essay will take a closer look at the side view.
First of all
, the increase in
fuel
cost
is able to
reduce
the commodity
consumptions
. It
directly
discourages the utilization and promotes the popularity of public transportations, and the carbon dioxide emissions released into the air
are lessened
and it impedes the process of air pollution and global warming.
For example
, if the gasoline is more expensive,
people
tend to take the bus or train
rather
than their
own
cars.
Besides
, it should be
improved
the efficiency of
house
appliances such as air conditioning, heating, cooking and
so
on, while the
government
could pass laws to limit the emissions from manufacturing generations.
For example
,
people
are able to switch to energy-efficient lighting
instead
of normal lighting.
Raising the
cost
of fossil
fuel
may lead to hassle living conditions for
people
who
live
in poverty-stricken countries. The higher tax on
fuel
is proportionate to higher production
cost
, which depends on machines operated by fossil
fuel
,
therefore
the inhabitants may struggle with more expensive
goods
. By investing more in alternative energies for sustainable growth, I believe that the
government
can play a paramount in addressing the
environmental
problems
, and I would argue that the best solution is to educate
people
with their awareness of our daily energy
use
to minimize the carbon dioxide emissions.
Taking everything into consideration, since
environmental
damage is a global issue and increase the price of
fuel
is a short-term solution to address the
environmental
problems
, as individuals we are able to contribute by taking steps to
reduce
our carbon dioxide emissions.