Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Discuss these two views and share your experience

Discuss these two views and share your experience bxdpP
With so many cars roaming our planet, the issue of global warming is becoming more and more serious. Some suggest governments should invest in public transportation while others think it's better to spend that money on the development of cars that don't pollute as much. Which of these two solutions is the most promising one? To begin with, it's no secret that public means of transportation are really eco-friendly and don't pollute nearly as much. Trains, buses, and trams usually run on electricity, which is a renewable source of energy and doesn't cause environmental pollution at all. People can commute to their desired destinations without spending much on transportation. However, the issue here is that people who use private cars are hardly going to change their transportation preferences. The reason for that is because cars are more convenient and don't have certain limitations, such as stops. So even if governments do invest in public transportation systems, the number of people that prefer cars over buses and trains is unlikely to change. On the contrary, many also advocate that, car manufacturers should start developing eco-friendly vehicles, such as electric or hybrid cars. By adopting this method, more renewable sources of energy will be used and gasoline/diesel consumption will decline. This will help the environment as there will be less carbon dioxide emissions, which of course are known to cause global warming. In my view, this is a better alternative as it doesn't require a shift in transportation preferences while the goal to help our planet is met as well. Taking everything into consideration, nations should start combating global warming as soon as possible, as this issue is a massive threat to our future generations. Even though investments in public transportation systems may seem like a viable solution, the development of hybrid and electric cars is more likely to help the problem.
With
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
roaming our planet, the issue of global warming is becoming more and more serious.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
suggest
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
should invest in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
while others
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
it's better to spend that money on the development of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
that don't pollute as much. Which of these two solutions is the most promising one?

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, it's no secret that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
means of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
are
really
eco-friendly and don't pollute
nearly
as much. Trains, buses, and trams
usually
run on electricity, which is a renewable source of energy and doesn't cause environmental pollution at all.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
can commute to their desired destinations without spending much on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
.
However
, the issue here is that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
are hardly going to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
preferences. The reason for
that is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
are more convenient and don't have certain limitations, such as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stops
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
even if
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
do invest in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
systems, the number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
that prefer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
over buses and trains is unlikely to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
.

On the contrary
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
also
advocate that,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
manufacturers should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
developing eco-friendly vehicles, such as electric or hybrid
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
. By adopting this method, more renewable sources of energy will be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
and gasoline/diesel consumption will decline. This will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the environment as there will be less carbon dioxide emissions, which
of course
are known
to cause global warming. In my view, this is a better alternative as it doesn't require a shift in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
preferences while the goal to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
our planet
is met
as well
.

Taking everything into consideration, nations should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
combating global warming as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
soon
as possible, as this issue is a massive threat to our future generations.
Even though
investments in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
systems may seem like a viable solution, the development of hybrid and electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
is more likely to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the problem.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Discuss these two views and share your experience

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
310 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 6band
    Many claims that junk food companies had a negative effect on the environment, changing food habits and family.
    Eating a junk diet is extremely common among communities, in this fast-paced era. Some individuals claim that fast food manufacturing had a detrimental brunt on the surrounding air, eating habits as well as on families. I, however, coincide with this phenomenon. Both the aspects shall be discussed i...
  • 5.5band
    Online shopping replacing offline
    Online shopping replacing offline or shopping from stores has become an integral part of the debate in the present world. While the proponents are in favor of the argument, the opponents are completely against it. In my opinion, there are lot of positives over the negatives in online shopping. To co...
  • 5band
    In your opinion, which source is more important, knowledge gain from books or knowledge gain from experience?
    Some people advocate that we learn from books more than what we learn from our experiences while others have an opposite idea. In my opinion, knowledge from experience is more important than knowledge from book. On the one hand, we read books alongside our school time to gain fundamental knowledge ...
  • 5.5band
    More and more adults spend time playing computer games. Why is this the case Is it a good or bad development
    Nowadays, we live in computer time, in the other words, in time the highest technology. And it affected on our life and also lifestyle. In particular, it related with adults and how computer games reflected on life. What is the reason that more adults spend time in virtual reality? First of all, it...
  • 6band
    Some people say city life is bad for young people.
    Nowadays young people are faced with a problem where to live better. More and more people understand that life in the stone forest is harmful and nasty. But what is the reason for this? The first and most essential reason related with one of the popular problem nowadays, by far. It is pollution bec...
  • 5.5band
    city buses track what do you think
    We live in a time when every day, if not every hour, something is being created, for instance, new type of vehicles. And so soon we will see that there is no one behind the wheel of transport. In fact, it means that artificial intelligence will manage cars, buses, trucks. People only will be as pass...