Whether or not tourist destinations benefit from international tourism is a debatable issue. To sonic governments, the local economic benefits are worth the overcrowding and hiked prices of the tourist season. However, there are environmental and social costs and other risks of relying on tourism as a major source of annual income.
Sleepy coastal communities can be changed beyond recognition by mass-market tourism. Package holiday companies operate huge numbers of low-cost flights to high-rise hotels in developing countries every summer. This means, of course, that easy money can be had servicing this seasonal influx and the government sees increased tax revenue and local employment. However, when the tourist season comes to an end, employment ceases and the area becomes a ghost town. The social cohesion of a small community can also be blighted by the seasonal migration of people to the cities to look for work out of season, leaving only the elderly behind. This is perhaps made worse by second home owners, who drive up house prices beyond the means of local inhabitants.
On the other hand, the local community do gain language skills and other fringe benefits of cultural exchange. Such a large volume of travellers every year can cause environmental problems to fragile habitats and historical sites. Age-old stone remains can be worn away and traditional buildings demolished in favour of bland international hotels. Local infrastructure can also fail to cope with large numbers of visitors, leading to pollution and litter. However, over time this can change as the economy improves and tourism becomes more of an established industry. Local government investment in infrastructure should ensure repeat trade and further benefits for the economy.
Overall, tourism can be a good source of income for countries blessed with natural beauty or sites of historical interest. However, governments must ensure that the wishes of local businesses are not put before the needs of the local community and that any revenue generated by tourism is reinvested in the area to protect the local environment.
Whether or not
tourist destinations
benefit
from international
tourism
is a debatable issue. To sonic
governments
, the
local
economic
benefits
are worth the overcrowding and hiked prices of the tourist season.
However
, there are environmental and social costs and other
risks
of relying on
tourism
as a major source of annual income.
Sleepy coastal
communities
can be
changed
beyond recognition by mass-market
tourism
. Package holiday
companies
operate huge numbers of low-cost flights to high-rise hotels in
developing countries
every summer. This means,
of course
, that easy money can
be had
servicing this seasonal influx and the
government
sees
increased tax revenue and
local
employment.
However
, when the tourist season
comes
to an
end
, employment ceases and the area becomes a ghost town. The social cohesion of a
small
community
can
also
be blighted
by the seasonal migration of
people
to the cities to look for work out of season, leaving
only
the elderly behind. This is perhaps made worse by second
home owners
, who drive up
house
prices beyond the means of
local
inhabitants.
On the other hand
, the
local
community
do gain language
skills
and other fringe
benefits
of cultural exchange. Such a large volume of
travellers
every year can cause environmental problems to fragile habitats and historical sites. Age-
old
stone remains can
be worn
away and traditional buildings demolished in
favour
of bland international hotels.
Local
infrastructure can
also
fail to cope with large numbers of visitors, leading to pollution and litter.
However
, over time this can
change
as the economy
improves
and
tourism
becomes more of an established industry.
Local
government
investment in infrastructure should ensure repeat trade and
further
benefits
for the economy.
Overall
,
tourism
can be a
good
source of income for countries blessed with natural beauty or sites of historical interest.
However
,
governments
must
ensure that the wishes of
local
businesses are not put
before
the needs of the
local
community
and that any revenue generated by
tourism
is reinvested
in the area to protect the
local
environment.