Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

\Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience v.1

\Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience v.1
The carbon dioxide resulting in combustion of gasoline in motor engine is accused by depleting the Ozon layer, so people has been heated debate over this topic. Some people suggest that the government uses the levy wage to develop research on the electric motor, others, proponents of this idea, say that it's better for the government to spend this fund on the public transport. It seems clear that the people divide into two campuses about the best solution. Firstly, it is apparent that official organization participation in improvement this engine, machine depending on electricity, the investigation will be beneficial for several reasons. Firstly, this participation will accelerate these researches. For example, If these organizations shared in this type of research, it would provide several facilitate for the scientists. As a result, the time requiring producing this type of machine will be short rationale. On the other hand, the proponents for previous idea believe that this financial should go to improve a public transport infrastructure for some reasons. The major reason is that an indefinite time is required to complete this investigation. For this reason, some environmentalists suggest that improvement the public transport is an urgent solution in order to face the green warehouse’s repercussions. It seems to my thinking way that I adamantly support invent an efficient alternative car for several aspects profoundly on my own experience. Firstly, the public transportation will not cover all country land, so the people will still need a car. In conclusion, the green Houseware is one of global challenge in the temporary world. This issue split the people into two side some of them appeal the state to develop the public transportation. The second side sees that it's better to develop electricity motor. In my opinion is that the public transportation cannot reach every piece in the country, so people still need the electric car.
The carbon dioxide resulting in combustion of gasoline in motor engine
is accused
by depleting the
Ozon
layer,
so
people
has
been heated
debate over this topic.
Some
people
suggest that the
government
uses
the levy wage to develop research on the electric motor, others, proponents of this
idea
, say that it's better for the
government
to spend this fund on the
public
transport. It seems
clear
that the
people
divide into two campuses about the best solution.

Firstly
, it is apparent that official organization participation in improvement this engine, machine depending on electricity, the investigation will be beneficial for several
reasons
.
Firstly
, this participation will accelerate these researches.
For example
, If these organizations shared in this type of research, it would provide several facilitate for the scientists.
As a result
, the time requiring producing this type of machine will be short rationale.

On the other hand
, the proponents for previous
idea
believe that this financial should go to
improve
a
public
transport infrastructure for
some
reasons
. The major
reason
is that an indefinite time
is required
to complete this investigation. For this
reason
,
some
environmentalists suggest that improvement the
public
transport is an urgent solution in order to face the green warehouse’s repercussions.

It seems to my thinking way that I
adamantly
support invent an efficient alternative car for several aspects
profoundly
on my
own
experience.
Firstly
, the
public
transportation will not cover all country land,
so
the
people
will
still
need a car.

In conclusion
, the green
Houseware
is one of global challenge in the temporary world. This issue split the
people
into two side
some
of them appeal the state to develop the
public
transportation. The second side
sees
that it's better to develop electricity motor. In my opinion is that the
public
transportation cannot reach every piece in the country,
so
people
still
need the electric car.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes

IELTS essay \Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience v.1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
311 words
7.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts