In recent years, the pay gap between company directors and their workers has widened significantly. Some think that this is not justifiable, but there is another school of thought which believes that those with the greatest responsibilities deserve the highest possible remuneration. In this essay I will consider both points of view and conclude that the best outcome would be a compromise between the two positions.
In order to reach the most senior executives have often achieved their roles due to extraordinary creativity and business acumen, and these attributes should attract salaries that reflect their contribution. While many employees can clock on and off and virtually forget their workplace outside these hours, senior managers rarely stop working, and many deal with problems and face important decisions at any time. The stress that goes with this level of responsibility cannot be easily imagined but the other workers, and deserves financial compensation. What is more, many companies would not exist were it not for the efforts and talents of these people who raise to the top, and in doing so provide employment opportunities for many other individuals.
By contrast, many think that there is a too great a divide between the benefits awarded to top executives and the rest of the company staff. It is argued that beyond a certain limit, no-one deserves such excessive payments, and that the knowledge of these sums have a powerful detrimental effect on the morale of those employees who earn for less. In turn this has a damaging consequenses for the quality of the output of these workers and undermines their loyalty to the organisation. I believe that company should look to share the financial prosperity that they enjoy among the employees more fairly. Even a relatively modest increase in pay and benefits has significant impact on the majority of employees, and leads to a happier workforce.
In conclusion, I would say that if organisation sought to share out financial benefits in such a way that everyone felt better treated, the result would be greater job satisfaction across the workforce, with all the benefits that that would bring.
In recent years, the pay gap between
company
directors and their workers has widened
significantly
.
Some
think
that this is not justifiable,
but
there is another school of
thought
which believes that those with the greatest responsibilities deserve the highest possible remuneration. In this essay I will consider both points of view and conclude that the best outcome would be a compromise between the two positions.
In order to reach the most senior executives have
often
achieved their roles due to extraordinary creativity and business acumen, and these attributes should attract salaries that reflect their contribution. While
many
employees
can clock on and off and
virtually
forget their workplace outside these hours, senior managers rarely
stop
working, and
many deal
with problems and face
important
decisions at any time. The
stress
that goes with this level of responsibility cannot be
easily
imagined
but
the other workers, and deserves financial compensation.
What is more
,
many
companies
would not exist were it not for the efforts and talents of these
people
who raise to the top, and in doing
so
provide employment opportunities for
many
other individuals.
By contrast,
many
think
that there is a too great a divide between the
benefits
awarded to top executives and the rest of the
company
staff. It
is argued
that beyond a certain limit, no-one deserves such excessive payments, and that the knowledge of these sums have a powerful detrimental effect on the morale of those
employees
who earn for less. In turn this has a damaging
consequenses
for the quality of the output of these workers and undermines their loyalty to the
organisation
. I believe that
company
should look to share the financial prosperity that they enjoy among the
employees
more
fairly
. Even a
relatively
modest increase in pay and
benefits
has significant impact on the majority of
employees
, and leads to a happier workforce.
In conclusion
, I would say that if
organisation
sought to share out financial
benefits
in such a way that everyone felt better treated, the result would be greater job satisfaction across the workforce, with all the
benefits
that that
would bring.