It is often believed that governments should conduct and supervise scientific studies instead of private companies. From my perspective, I completely agree with this statement because of the following reasons.
Firstly, governments have sufficient resources in order to undertake those studies properly. In other words, scientific research usually requires cutting-edge facilities as well as advanced technologies that usually cost a considerable amount of money. However, the government budget could remain sustainable via their residents’ tax, allowing them to carry the research out effectively and productively. One illustration of this is nuclear energy research, which was undertaken by the US government years ago. Although the research was reported to use up to $300 million to build nuclear plants only, the scientists made a scientific breakthrough in terms of nuclear power, which led to the decrease in the use of fossil energy, and built a firm foundation of sustainable energy for the whole country.
Secondly, corporations working on scientific research may be tempted to maximize profits. This can be explained by the fact that scientific studies usually have great financial potential, which makes some companies attempt to introduce their research to the public hurriedly without adequate trial tests. Regarding medical field, for instance, a new invention can usually give patients a sense of hope. As a result, in order to have effective treatments, they are willing to play no matter what it costs. Therefore, if the invention is done carelessly just to earn profits, not only could it waste patients’ money but it can also put their lives at risk.
In conclusion, due to the quality of scientific research and ethical aspect when doing it, I agree strongly with the view that scientific research should be monitored and conducted by governments.
It is
often
believed that
governments
should conduct and supervise
scientific
studies
instead
of private
companies
. From my perspective, I completely
agree
with this statement
because
of the following reasons.
Firstly
,
governments
have sufficient resources in order to undertake those studies
properly
.
In other words
,
scientific
research
usually
requires cutting-edge facilities
as well
as advanced technologies that
usually
cost a considerable amount of money.
However
, the
government
budget could remain sustainable via their residents’ tax, allowing them to carry the
research
out
effectively
and
productively
. One illustration of this is nuclear energy
research
, which was undertaken by the US
government
years ago. Although the
research
was reported
to
use
up to $300 million to build nuclear plants
only
, the scientists made a
scientific
breakthrough in terms of nuclear power, which led to the decrease in the
use
of fossil energy, and built a firm foundation of sustainable energy for the whole country.
Secondly
, corporations working on
scientific
research
may
be tempted
to maximize profits. This can be
explained
by the fact that
scientific
studies
usually
have great financial potential, which
makes
some
companies
attempt to introduce their
research
to the public
hurriedly
without adequate trial
tests
. Regarding medical field,
for instance
, a new invention can
usually
give patients a sense of hope.
As a result
, in order to have effective treatments, they are willing to play no matter what it costs.
Therefore
, if the invention
is done
carelessly
just
to earn profits, not
only
could it waste patients’ money
but
it can
also
put their
lives
at
risk
.
In conclusion
, due to the quality of
scientific
research
and ethical aspect when doing it, I
agree
strongly
with the view that
scientific
research
should
be monitored
and conducted by
governments
.