It is often believed that governments should conduct and supervise scientific studies instead of private companies. From my perspective, I completely agree with this statement because of the following reasons.
Firstly, governments have sufficient resources in order to undertake those studies properly. In other words, scientific research usually requires cutting-edge facilities as well as advanced technologies that usually cost a considerable amount of money. However, the government budget could remain sustainable via their residents’ tax, allowing them to carry the research out effectively and productively. One illustration of this is nuclear energy research, which was undertaken by the US government years ago. Although the research was reported to use up to $300 million to build nuclear plants only, the scientists made a scientific breakthrough in terms of nuclear power, which led to the decrease in the use of fossil energy, and built a firm foundation of sustainable energy for the whole country.
Secondly, corporations working on scientific research may be tempted to maximize profits. This can be explained by the fact that scientific studies usually have great financial potential, which makes some companies attempt to introduce their research to the public hurriedly without adequate trial tests. Regarding medical field, for instance, a new invention can usually give patients a sense of hope. As a result, in order to have effective treatments, they are willing to play no matter what it costs. Therefore, if the invention is done carelessly just to earn profits, not only could it waste patients’ money but it can also put their lives at risk.
In conclusion, due to the quality of scientific research and ethical aspect when doing it, I agree strongly with the view that scientific research should be monitored and conducted by governments. 
It is  
often
 believed that  
governments
 should conduct and supervise  
scientific
 studies  
instead
 of private  
companies
. From my perspective, I completely  
agree
 with this statement  
because
 of the following reasons. 
Firstly
,  
governments
 have sufficient resources in order to undertake those studies  
properly
.  
In other words
,  
scientific
  research
  usually
 requires cutting-edge facilities  
as well
 as advanced technologies that  
usually
 cost a considerable amount of money.  
However
, the  
government
 budget could remain sustainable via their residents’ tax, allowing them to carry the  
research
 out  
effectively
 and  
productively
. One illustration of this is nuclear energy  
research
, which was undertaken by the US  
government
 years ago. Although the  
research
  was reported
 to  
use
 up to $300 million to build nuclear plants  
only
, the scientists made a  
scientific
 breakthrough in terms of nuclear power, which led to the decrease in the  
use
 of fossil energy, and built a firm foundation of sustainable energy for the whole country. 
Secondly
, corporations working on  
scientific
  research
 may  
be tempted
 to maximize profits. This can be  
explained
 by the fact that  
scientific
 studies  
usually
 have great financial potential, which  
makes
  some
  companies
 attempt to introduce their  
research
 to the public  
hurriedly
 without adequate trial  
tests
. Regarding medical field,  
for instance
, a new invention can  
usually
 give patients a sense of hope.  
As a result
, in order to have effective treatments, they are willing to play no matter what it costs.  
Therefore
, if the invention  
is done
  carelessly
  just
 to earn profits, not  
only
 could it waste patients’ money  
but
 it can  
also
 put their  
lives
 at  
risk
. 
In conclusion
, due to the quality of  
scientific
  research
 and ethical aspect when doing it, I  
agree
  strongly
 with the view that  
scientific
  research
 should  
be monitored
 and conducted by  
governments
.