A survey conducted by Anthony Synod at Montreal's Concordia University asked participants to comment on how essential smell was to them in their lives. It became apparent that smell can evoke strong emotional responses. A scent associated with a good experience can bring a rush of joy, while a foul odor or one associated with a bad memory may make us grimace with disgust. Respondents to the survey noted that numerous of their olfactory likes and dislikes were based on emotional associations. Such associations can be powerful abundance consequently that odors that we would generally label unpleasant become agreeable, and those that we would generally consider fragrant become disagreeable for particular individuals. The perception of smell, therefore, consists not only of the sensation of the odors themselves on the contrary of the experiences and emotions associated with them.
Odors are also essential cues in social bonding. One respondent to the survey believed that there is no true emotional bonding without touching and smelling a loved one. Infants recognize the Odors of their mothers in the near future after birth and adults can frequently identify their children or spouses by scent. In one well-known.
Test, women, and men were able to distinguish by smell alone clothing worn by their marriage partners from similar clothing worn by other people. Most of the subjects would probably never have given much thought to Odors as a cue for identifying family members previously being involved in the test, on the contrary as the experiment revealed, even when not consciously considered, smells register.
Despite its importance to our emotional and sensory lives, the smell is probably the most undervalued sense in a number of cultures. The reason frequently given for the low regard in which smell is held is that, in comparison with its importance among· animals, the human sense of smell is feeble and undeveloped. While it is true that the olfactory powers of humans are nothing like as fine as those possessed by certain animals, they are still remarkably acute. Our noses can recognize thousands of smells, and perceive Odors that are present only in extremely tiny quantities.
Smell, however, is a highly elusive phenomenon. Odors, unlike colors, for instance, cannot be named in a plethora of languages due to the fact the specific vocabulary simply doesn't exist. 'It smells like we ought to say when describing Odors, struggling to express our olfactory experience. Nor can Odors be recorded: there is no effective way to either capture or store them over time. In the realm of olfaction, we must make do with descriptions and recollections. This has implications for olfactory research.
Most of the research on smell undertaken to date has been of a physical scientific nature. Significant advances have been made in the understanding of the biological and chemical nature of olfaction, but a plethora of fundamental questions have yet to be answered. Researchers have still to decide whether the smell is one sense or two — one responding to Odors proper and the other registering odorless chemicals in the air. Other unanswered questions are whether the nose is the only part of the body affected by Odors, and how smells can be measured objectively given the non-physical components. Questions like these mean that interest in the psychology of smell is inevitably set to play an increasingly critical role for researchers.
However, the smell is not simply a biological and psychological phenomenon. The smell is cultural, hence it is a social and historical phenomenon. Odors are invested with cultural values: smells that are considered to be offensive in a number of cultures may be perfectly acceptable in others. Therefore, our sense of smell is a means of, and model for, interacting with the world. Various smells can provide us with intimate and emotionally charged experiences and the value that we attach to these experiences is interiorized by the members of society in a deeply personal way. Importantly, our commonly held feelings about smells can help distinguish us from other cultures. The study of the cultural history of smell is, therefore, in an extremely real sense, an investigation into the essence of human culture.
A survey conducted by Anthony Synod at Montreal's Concordia University asked participants to comment on how essential
smell
was to them in their
lives
. It became apparent that
smell
can evoke strong
emotional
responses. A scent associated with a
good
experience
can bring a rush of joy, while a foul
odor
or one associated with a
bad
memory may
make
us grimace with disgust. Respondents to the survey noted that numerous of their olfactory likes and dislikes
were based
on
emotional
associations. Such associations can be powerful abundance
consequently
that
odors
that we would
generally
label unpleasant become agreeable, and those that we would
generally
consider fragrant become disagreeable for particular individuals. The perception of
smell
,
therefore
, consists not
only
of the sensation of the
odors
themselves
on the contrary
of the
experiences
and emotions associated with them.
Odors are
also
essential cues in social bonding. One respondent to the survey believed that there is no true
emotional
bonding without touching and smelling a
loved
one. Infants recognize the
Odors
of their mothers in the near future after birth and adults can
frequently
identify their children or spouses by scent. In one well-known.
Test
, women, and
men
were able to distinguish by
smell
alone clothing worn by their marriage partners from similar clothing worn by
other
people
. Most of the subjects would
probably
never have
given
much
thought
to
Odors
as a cue for identifying family members previously
being involved
in the
test
,
on the contrary
as the experiment revealed, even when not
consciously
considered,
smells
register.
Despite its importance to our
emotional
and sensory
lives
, the
smell
is
probably
the most undervalued
sense
in a number of
cultures
. The reason
frequently
given
for the low regard in which
smell
is held
is that,
in comparison
with its importance among· animals, the human
sense
of
smell
is feeble and undeveloped. While it is true that the olfactory powers of humans are nothing like as fine as those possessed by certain animals, they are
still
remarkably
acute. Our noses can recognize thousands of
smells
, and perceive
Odors
that are present
only
in
extremely
tiny quantities.
Smell,
however
, is a
highly
elusive phenomenon.
Odors
, unlike colors,
for instance
, cannot
be named
in a plethora of languages due to the fact the specific vocabulary
simply
doesn't exist. 'It
smells
like we ought to say when describing
Odors
, struggling to express our olfactory
experience
. Nor can
Odors
be recorded
: there is no effective way to either capture or store them over time. In the realm of olfaction, we
must
make
do with descriptions and recollections. This has implications for olfactory research.
Most of the research on
smell
undertaken to date has been of a physical scientific nature. Significant advances have
been made
in the understanding of the biological and chemical nature of olfaction,
but
a plethora of fundamental questions have
yet
to
be answered
. Researchers have
still
to decide whether the
smell
is one
sense
or two — one responding to
Odors
proper and the
other
registering odorless chemicals in the air.
Other
unanswered questions are whether the nose is the
only
part of the body
affected
by
Odors
, and how
smells
can
be measured
objectively
given
the non-physical components. Questions like these mean that interest in the psychology of
smell
is
inevitably
set to play an
increasingly
critical role for researchers.
However
, the
smell
is not
simply
a biological and psychological phenomenon. The
smell
is cultural,
hence
it is a social and historical phenomenon.
Odors
are invested
with cultural values:
smells
that
are considered
to be offensive in a number of
cultures
may be
perfectly
acceptable in others.
Therefore
, our
sense
of
smell
is a means of, and model for, interacting with the world. Various
smells
can provide us with intimate and
emotionally
charged
experiences
and the value that we attach to these
experiences
is interiorized
by the members of society in a
deeply
personal way.
Importantly
, our
commonly
held feelings about
smells
can
help
distinguish us from
other
cultures
. The study of the cultural history of
smell
is,
therefore
, in an
extremely
real
sense
, an investigation into the essence of human
culture
.