Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

To what extent are human rights protected today?

To what extent are human rights protected today? ABGnN
Human rights, applied to all ci7zen regardless of wealth, have been given since birth to death. This including rights to address free speech, access to basic educa7on albeit the fact that in some na7ons their rights are heavily restricted by the government. In Britain, for instance, also have the human rights act that are well-protected and published in 1998. The root of human rights in the UK came from many developments such as the Magna Carta and bill of rights in 1215 and 1689, respec7vely. In different countries across the world, on the other hand, perceived the support from United Na7ons to set out the universal framework upon Human rights so called “The Universal Declara7on of Human rights or UDHF”. Secondly, there is a problema7c concep7on with United Na7on Human Rights. They do not have the authorita7ve power to conceal civil liber7es in a variety of countries. In the real life scenarios, the officials of each na7on are highly likely to be responsible for preserving human rights. Therefore, different na7ons have different range in terms of human right protec7on. This can be seen that Norway has the best protec7on and North Korea has the worst among all countries in the world. This essay will be clearly elaborate the informa7on regards Human Rights protec7on in poli7cal systems nowadays and will deepen further into how well it is preserving. More importantly, will examine the advantages and nega7vity of Human Rights protec7on in a variety of countries. In the United States, there is a dignity in different races and gender equality that are not as well protected as it needed to be. The cons7tu7on found in the US have had certain equivalent to what is stated in the UDHF par7cularly within the fundamental rights of poli7cal and civil liber7es such as presump7on of a criminal trial and freedom of movement. U. S. courts provide a resolu7on for people whose cons7tu7onal rights have been violated. Nevertheless, there are certain aspects that were not recognised to be the rights according to the cons7tu7on in some of US states. One of them is the right to have adequate standard of living, which should priori7se them with basic necessi7es. With this inten7on in mind, it can be said that even in the US, that is known to be a country of freedom, yet its cons7tu7on did not well-address the actual issues faced by many homeless and people who have no access to technological advancement. For instance, the case study of George Floyd, a tragedy of person who was inten7onally killed by the police officer together with his colleagues because they judged him based on his skin colour. This raised people’s awareness of the inequality in our modern society not only with race, but also transgender from one to another as well. For this reason, there is a viral social media hashtag BlackLivesMa]er in pla^orms such as Twi]er, Facebook or even Instagram against misbehaviour and those whom racist others. Owing to the fact that, this is not the only case which happened to be violence used, many people around the world gathering together to protest and brought about some of the most vital agenda in the US history. Though, it is clearly state in the US cons7tu7on which allow its ci7zen to protest against their own cons7tu7on peacefully, yet the current president, Donald Trump, s7ll use military forces to fight back. In Britain, on the other hand, have been using uncodified, meaning it has always be unwri]en which make their country unique as there are only four countries in the world that s7ll applied this tradi7on whilst the rest have changed to codified one already. As such Bri7sh people have less protec7on of their rules of law than the US and other counterparts. According to the following reason, the Great Britain under Tony Blair as the government passed the Human Rights act in 1998. It is noted worthy that the Parliament s7ll responsible to made the ul7mate decision when people’s demand for change in legisla7on. Aber Tony Blair introduced the Human Rights Act (HRA) with the concept “bring rights home”, this made the European Conven7on as part of Bri7sh Law bodies to have a stronger protec7on to all UK ci7zens. However, it can be cancelled by the government by vo7ng in the Parliament. Likewise, the current Conserva7ve Government has a large majority of power and been discussed replacing the HRA with their own ‘Bill of Rights’. The rhetorical ques7on then remained how it will suit other country apart from England such as Northern Ireland and in Scotland that has its own act of which published in the same year as the HRA. Also, it is debatable whether Scotland have to amended its act or it can remain unchanged. Aside that, the HRA is uncommon amongst the general public, commentators and non-governmental organisa7ons whom cri7cised this act because it had substan7al influence on the UK law. Consequencesly, there are only small margin of people that support the HRA. In developing country, Thailand, for instance, have been dictated by the military aber flawed elec7ons held in 2019. The Prime Minister of Thailand, General Prayut Chan-ocha in his second 7me as the head of Minister was known to be unpopular, unprepared and being one of the worst leaders that Thai’s people ever votes for. Not only that but he also oben suppress the informa7on regards the monarch, restrictedly prohibited peaceful rallies. Most of the offenders may results in wide range of scales from ended up being arrested in jails or worst got assassinated by the authori7es. There is also a con7nuous armed conflicts going on between Muslim and Buddhism near the Southern border of the country that is connected to Malaysia. In September 2014, there was a miserable case of human rights ac7vist of ethnic called”Karen”, who was confirmed death aber has not been seen at Kaeng Krachan Na7onal Park from that point onwards. Taking this into an account, no progress in inves7ga7ons found, plus, the disappearance of several poli7cal ac7vists made the online broadcasts exiled cri7cising the claim that the monarchy himselves was responsible for ordered those ac7ons. Unfortunately, landless people and those living in poverty has sentenced by the judged of up to 10 years’ imprisonment for trespass, this including fourteen famers. The reflec7on of these circumstances are therefore raised people’s suspicious.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
, applied to all ci7zen regardless of wealth, have been
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
since birth to death. This including
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
to address free speech, access to basic educa7on albeit the fact that in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
na7ons their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
are
heavily
restricted by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
. In Britain,
for instance
,
also
have the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
act
that are well-protected and published in 1998. The root of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
in the UK came from
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
developments such as the Magna Carta and bill of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
in 1215 and 1689,
respec7vely
. In
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
across the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
, on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, perceived the support from United Na7ons to set out the universal framework upon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
called “The Universal Declara7on of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
or
Possible spelling mistake found.
UDHF
”.

Secondly
, there is a problema7c concep7on with United Na7on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rights
. They do not have the authorita7ve power to conceal civil liber7es in a variety of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
. In the real life scenarios, the officials of each na7on are
highly
likely to be responsible for preserving
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
.
Therefore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
na7ons have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
range in terms of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
protec7on. This can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that Norway has the best protec7on and North Korea has the worst among all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
. This essay will be
clearly
elaborate the informa7on regards
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rights
protec7on in poli7cal systems nowadays and will deepen
further
into how well it is preserving. More
importantly
, will examine the advantages and nega7vity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rights
protec7on in a variety of countries.

In the United States, there is a dignity in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
races and gender equality that are not
as well
protected as it needed to be. The cons7tu7on found in the US have had certain equivalent to what
is stated
in the
Possible spelling mistake found.
UDHF
par7cularly
within the fundamental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
of poli7cal and civil liber7es such as presump7on of a criminal trial and freedom of movement. U. S. courts provide a resolu7on for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
whose cons7tu7onal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
have
been violated
.
Nevertheless
, there are certain aspects that were not
Possible spelling mistake. 'recognised' is British English.
recognised
to be the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
according to the cons7tu7on in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
of US states. One of them is the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
to have adequate standard of living, which should priori7se them with basic necessi7es. With this inten7on in mind, it can
be said
that even in the US, that
is known
to be a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
of freedom,
yet
its cons7tu7on did not well-address the actual issues faced by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
homeless and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who have no access to technological advancement.
For instance
, the case study of George Floyd, a tragedy of person who was
inten7onally
killed by the police officer together with his colleagues
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they judged him based on his skin
Possible spelling mistake. 'colour' is British English.
colour
. This raised
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people’s
awareness of the inequality in our modern society not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
with race,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
transgender from one to another
as well
.
For this reason
, there is a viral social media hashtag
Possible spelling mistake found.
BlackLivesMa
Unpaired symbol: '[' seems to be missing
]
er in
Possible spelling mistake found.
pla^orms
such as
Possible spelling mistake found.
Twi
Unpaired symbol: '[' seems to be missing
]
er, Facebook or even Instagram against
Possible spelling mistake. 'misbehaviour' is British English.
misbehaviour
and those whom racist others. Owing to the fact that, this is not the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
case which happened to be violence
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
around the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
gathering together to protest and brought about
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
of the most vital agenda in the US history. Though, it is
clearly
state in the US cons7tu7on which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
its ci7zen to protest against their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
cons7tu7on
peacefully
,
yet
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
president, Donald Trump, s7ll
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
military forces to fight back.

In Britain, on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, have been using uncodified, meaning it has always
Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: "been".
be
Possible spelling mistake found.
unwri
Unpaired symbol: '[' seems to be missing
]
en which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
unique as there are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
four
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
that s7ll applied this tradi7on whilst the rest have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changed
to codified one already. As such Bri7sh
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have less protec7on of their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
of law than the US and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
counterparts.

According to the following reason, the Great Britain under Tony Blair as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
passed the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rights
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
act
in 1998. It
is noted
worthy that the Parliament s7ll responsible
Did you mean "to make"?
to made
the

ul7mate decision when
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people’s
demand for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
in legisla7on.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Aber
Tony Blair introduced the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rights
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Act
(
Possible spelling mistake found.
HRA
) with the concept “bring
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
home”, this made the European Conven7on as part of Bri7sh Law bodies to have a stronger protec7on to all UK ci7zens.
However
, it can
be cancelled
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
by vo
Insert a space between the numerical value and the unit symbol "7 ng"
7ng
in the Parliament.
Likewise
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
Conserva7ve
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Government
has a large majority of power and
been discussed
replacing the
Possible spelling mistake found.
HRA
with their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
‘Bill of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rights’
. The rhetorical ques7on then remained how it will suit
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
apart from England such as Northern Ireland and in Scotland that has its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
act
of which published in the same year as the
Possible spelling mistake found.
HRA
.
Also
, it is debatable whether Scotland
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
amended its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
act
or it can remain unchanged. Aside that, the
Possible spelling mistake found.
HRA
is uncommon
Do not mix variants of the same word ('amongst' and 'among') within a single text.
amongst
the
Consider using "public".
general public
, commentators and non-governmental organisa7ons whom cri7cised this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
act
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it had substan7al influence on the UK law.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Consequencesly
, there are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
margin of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
that support the
Possible spelling mistake found.
HRA
.

In developing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
, Thailand,
for instance
, have
been dictated
by the military
Possible spelling mistake found.
aber
flawed elec7ons held in 2019. The Prime Minister of Thailand, General
Possible spelling mistake found.
Prayut
Possible spelling mistake found.
Chan-ocha
in his second 7me as the head of Minister
was known
to be unpopular, unprepared and being one of the worst leaders that Thai’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
ever votes for. Not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
he
also
Possible spelling mistake found.
oben
suppress the informa7on regards the monarch,
Possible spelling mistake found.
restrictedly
prohibited peaceful rallies. Most of the offenders may results in wide range of scales from ended up
being arrested
in jails or worst
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
got
assassinated by the authori7es. There is
also
a con7nuous armed conflicts going on between Muslim and Buddhism near the Southern border of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
that
is connected
to Malaysia. In September 2014, there was a miserable case of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
ac7vist of ethnic called
There should be a space after a closing quote.
”Karen
”, who
was confirmed
death
Possible spelling mistake found.
aber
has not been
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
at
Possible spelling mistake found.
Kaeng
Possible spelling mistake found.
Krachan
Na7onal Park from that point onwards. Taking this into an account, no progress in inves7ga7ons found, plus, the disappearance of several poli7cal ac7vists made the online broadcasts exiled cri7cising the claim that the monarchy
Possible spelling mistake found.
himselves
was responsible for ordered those ac7ons. Unfortunately, landless
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
and those living in poverty has sentenced by the judged of up to 10 years’ imprisonment for trespass, this including fourteen
Possible spelling mistake found.
famers
. The reflec7on of these circumstances are
therefore
raised
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people’s
suspicious.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay To what extent are human rights protected today?

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
1053 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts