The professional sports like the Olympics, the World cup and cultural programs are in the existence for a long time and have played an imperative role in people's life. Some individuals consider that the national and local authorities ought to allocate the funds for the international teams and their team members who host their country. On the other hand, others claim that the NGO should contributed for these teams. Before, I have stated my opinion, both views should be analysed first.
The supporters who say that the government should foster the international teams and its players, give underlying explanations. First, these sports teams represent their country on a worldwide platform. They break a record or get victory, is all create a national pride and arouse patriotism among its citizens. Second, these international competitions increase valuable tourism, and boost local economies. Lastly, these international and national sports improve global trade and stature.
However, those is favour of NGO funding for the sports teams argue that this would release some burden off the government's shoulder, which can help to focus on other areas. Moreover, the large organizations are profit driven, so they should provide the coaching and facilities for these teams. Also, they can promote their products and services through these scholarships and charity. Thus, this would be a win- win situation for both.
To conclude from the above mentioned arguments, the government should financially support these sports teams and their players to achieve a desirable performance because NGO cannot provide stable support, which may tarnish the country's image.
The professional
sports
like the Olympics, the World cup and cultural programs are in the existence for a long time and have played an imperative role in
people
's life.
Some
individuals consider that the national and local authorities ought to allocate the funds for the
international
teams
and their
team
members who host their country.
On the other hand
, others claim that the NGO should
contributed
for these
teams
.
Before
, I have stated my opinion, both views should be
analysed
first
.
The supporters who say that the
government
should foster the
international
teams
and its players, give underlying explanations.
First
, these
sports
teams
represent their country on a worldwide platform. They break a record or
get
victory, is all create a national pride and arouse patriotism among its citizens. Second, these
international
competitions increase valuable tourism, and boost local economies.
Lastly
, these
international
and national
sports
improve
global trade and stature.
However
,
those is
favour
of NGO funding for the
sports
teams
argue that this would release
some
burden off the
government
's shoulder, which can
help
to focus on other areas.
Moreover
, the large organizations are profit driven,
so
they should provide the coaching and facilities for these
teams
.
Also
, they can promote their products and services through these scholarships and charity.
Thus
, this would be a win- win situation for both.
To conclude
from the above mentioned arguments, the
government
should
financially
support these
sports
teams
and their players to achieve a desirable performance
because
NGO cannot provide stable support, which may tarnish the country's image.