It is a view held by a few individuals that because of increasing college expenditure, and decreasing job opportunities, universities should refrain from teaching humanities subjects like philosophy, and history. Instead, they must focus on practical degree courses that would increase the chances of employment. I disagree with the view held and would elaborate on my reasons.
Students choose their career path while at school. When they leave the institution to study further, they have a set goal in mind. Hence, they take subjects based on their abilities to cope with studies that will help them further with a career. A university is but an institution, which offers only the best to its prospects. Studies beyond collegiate education have always been expensive. When pupils decide on the occupation, they want to engage with, they simultaneously focus, on the education required to achieve the goal. Although there are limitations with philosophy, and history as a career choice, it is easier now to flip fields with these backgrounds. For example: A graduate in history can also find a job as a research analyst apart from being an archaeologist. These branches of study are not limited to just one field.
On the contrary courses like medicine, and engineering is often lucrative due to the money earned. But, these often are difficult for people struggling with numbers and excessive studies. Every human being has a unique intellectual capacity. It cannot be the case where because employment with art’s subjects is low that people will opt for something beyond their capability.
In conclusion, employment is not limited it is the skill set that do not match.
It is a view held by a few individuals that
because
of increasing college expenditure, and decreasing job opportunities, universities should refrain from teaching humanities subjects like philosophy, and history.
Instead
, they
must
focus on practical degree courses that would increase the chances of employment. I disagree with the view held and would elaborate on my reasons.
Students choose their career path while at school. When they
leave
the institution to
study
further
, they have a set goal in mind.
Hence
, they take subjects based on their abilities to cope with
studies
that will
help
them
further
with a career. A university is
but
an institution, which offers
only
the best to its prospects.
Studies
beyond collegiate education have always been expensive. When pupils decide on the occupation, they want to engage with, they
simultaneously
focus, on the education required to achieve the goal. Although there are limitations with philosophy, and history as a career choice, it is easier
now
to flip fields with these backgrounds.
For example
: A graduate in history can
also
find a job as a research analyst apart from being an archaeologist. These branches of
study
are not limited to
just
one field.
On the contrary
courses like medicine, and engineering is
often
lucrative due to the money earned.
But
, these
often are
difficult for
people
struggling with numbers and excessive
studies
. Every human being has a unique intellectual capacity. It cannot be the case where
because
employment with art’s subjects is low that
people
will opt for something beyond their capability.
In conclusion
, employment is not limited it is the
skill
set that do not match.