Exams have always been used as a way to measure students’ ability and level of learning. However, I contend that it is not an appropriate way to determine one’s performance and it should be substituted by a continuous assessment approach. The reasons for my contention are as follows.
Nowadays, cheating on exams is a commonplace. Therefore, it is not uncommon for students who do not do well in the class to score high on the exams. Thus, when something like this occurs, there is no way for authorities to confirm whether or not the answers on the exams are really from the student and not the results of an unfair play. Teachers might forestall cheating from taking place, be it by strict invigilating or by the threat to fail the students who do not abide by the rules, there’s still no way to ascertain that every student will comply with the rules. Hence the ineffectiveness of utilising exams as a way of measuring the ability of each student is quite clean.
Furthermore, students have the tendency to memorise for exams without putting any effort in trying to thoroughly understand the materials taught. They will strive to obtain the highest score possible by this means. Memorising is surely a quick way to obtain a good score in a short time, however, it is not an effective way to study if one wants to deeply understand the materials. Consequently, exams are not appropriate when used to measure the ability of the students who memorise.
In conclusion, I believe that the best way to determine a student’s ability is to continuously assess their performance in the classroom. By doing that, fair judgment of each student’s ability will be ensured and students will also be fairly scored based on how well they do in the class
Exams have always been
used
as a way to measure
students’
ability
and level of learning.
However
, I contend that it is not an appropriate way to determine one’s performance and it should
be substituted
by a continuous assessment approach. The reasons for my contention are as follows.
Nowadays, cheating on exams is a commonplace.
Therefore
, it is not uncommon for
students
who do not do well in the
class
to score high on the exams.
Thus
, when something like this occurs, there is no way for authorities to confirm
whether or not
the answers on the exams are
really
from the
student
and not the results of an unfair play. Teachers might forestall cheating from taking place, be it by strict invigilating or by the threat to fail the
students
who do not abide by the
rules
, there’s
still
no way to ascertain that every
student
will comply with the
rules
.
Hence
the ineffectiveness of
utilising
exams as a way of measuring the
ability
of each
student
is quite clean.
Furthermore
,
students
have the tendency to
memorise
for exams without putting any effort in trying to
thoroughly
understand the materials taught. They will strive to obtain the highest score possible by this means.
Memorising
is
surely
a quick way to obtain a
good
score in a short time,
however
, it is not an effective way to study if one wants to
deeply
understand the materials.
Consequently
, exams are not appropriate when
used
to measure the
ability
of the
students
who
memorise
.
In conclusion
, I believe that the best way to determine a
student’s
ability
is to
continuously
assess their performance in the classroom. By doing that,
fair
judgment of each
student’s
ability
will
be ensured
and
students
will
also
be
fairly
scored based on how well they do in the
class