By the year 2050, nearly 80% of the Earth's population will live in urban centers. Applying the most conservative estimates to current demographic trends, the human population will increase by about three billion people by then. An estimated 10 hectares of new land (about 20% larger than Brazil) will be needed to grow abundance food to feed them, if traditional farming methods continue as they are practiced today. At present, throughout the world, over 80% of the land that is suitable for raising crops is in use. Historically, a number of 15% of that has been laid waste by poor management practices. What can be done to ensure abundance food for the world's population to live on?
The concept of indoor farming is not new, since hothouse production of tomatoes and other produce has been in vogue for a number of time. What is new is the urgent need to scale up this technology to accommodate another three billion people. a plethora of believe an entirely new approach to indoor farming is required, employing cutting-edge technologies. One such proposal is for the 'Vertical Farm'. The concept is of multistory buildings in which food crops are grown in environmentally controlled conditions. Situated in the heart of urban centers, they would drastically reduce the amount of transportation required to bring food to consumers. Vertical farms would need to be efficient, cheap to construct and safe to operate. If successfully implemented, proponents claim, vertical farms offer the promise of urban renewal, sustainable production of a safe and varied food supply (through year-round production of all crops), and the eventual repair of ecosystems that have been sacrificed for horizontal farming.
It took humans 10, 000 years to learn how to grow most of the crops we now take for granted. Along the way, we despoiled most of the land we worked, frequently turning verdant, natural colones into semi-arid deserts. Within that same time frame, we evolved into an urban species, in which 60% of the human population now lives vertically in cities. This means that, for the majority, we humans have shelter from the elements, yet we subject our food-bearing plants to the rigors of the great outdoors and can do no more than hope for a good weather year. However, more often than not now, due to a rapidly changing climate, that is not what happens. Massive floods, long droughts, hurricanes and severe monsoons take their toll each year, destroying millions of tons of valuable crops.
The supporters of vertical farming claim a number of potential advantages for the system. For instance, crops would be produced all year round, as they would be kept in artificially controlled, optimum growing conditions. There would be no weather-related crop failures due to droughts, floods or pests. All the food could be grown organically, eliminating the need for herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers. The system would greatly reduce the incidence of numerous infectious diseases that are acquired at the agricultural interface. Although the system would consume energy, it would return energy to the grid via methane generation from composting non-edible parts of plants. It would also dramatically reduce fossil fuel use, by cutting out the need for tractors, plows and shipping.
A major drawback of vertical farming, however, is that the plants would require artificial light. Without it, those plants nearest the windows would be exposed to more sunlight and grow more quickly, reducing the efficiency of the system. Single storey greenhouses have the benefit of natural overhead light: even consequently, a number of still need artificial lighting. A multistory facility with no natural overhead light would require far more. Generating abundance light could be prohibitively expensive, unless cheap, renewable energy is available, and this appears to be rather a future aspiration than a likelihood for the near future.
One variation on vertical farming that has been developed is to grow plants in stacked trays that move on rails. Moving the trays allows the plants to get abundance sunlight. This system is already in operation, and works well within a single storey greenhouse with light reaching it from above: it is not certain, however, that it can be made to work without that overhead natural light.
Vertical farming is an attempt to address the undoubted problems that we face in producing abundance food for a growing population. At the moment, though, more needs to be done to reduce the detrimental impact it would have on the environment, particularly as regards the use of energy. While it is possible that much of our food will be grown in skyscrapers in the future, most experts currently believe it is far more likely that we will simply use the space available on urban rooftops.
By the
year
2050,
nearly
80% of the Earth's
population
will
live
in
urban
centers. Applying the most conservative estimates to
current
demographic trends, the
human
population
will increase by about three billion
people
by then. An estimated 10 hectares of
new
land (about 20% larger than Brazil) will
be needed
to
grow
abundance
food
to feed them, if traditional
farming
methods continue as they
are practiced
today
. At present, throughout the world, over 80% of the land
that is
suitable for raising
crops
is in
use
.
Historically
, a
number
of 15% of that has
been laid
waste by poor management practices. What can
be done
to ensure
abundance
food
for the world's
population
to
live
on?
The concept of indoor
farming
is not
new
, since hothouse production of tomatoes and other produce has been in vogue for a
number
of time. What is
new
is the urgent
need
to scale up this technology to accommodate another three billion
people
.
a
plethora of believe an
entirely
new
approach to indoor
farming
is required
, employing cutting-edge technologies. One such proposal is for the 'Vertical Farm'. The concept is of multistory buildings in which
food
crops
are grown
in
environmentally
controlled conditions. Situated in the heart of
urban
centers, they would
drastically
reduce
the amount of transportation required to bring
food
to consumers.
Vertical
farms would
need
to be efficient,
cheap
to construct and safe to operate. If
successfully
implemented, proponents claim,
vertical
farms offer the promise of
urban
renewal, sustainable production of a safe and varied
food
supply (through year-round production of all
crops)
, and the eventual repair of ecosystems that have
been sacrificed
for horizontal farming.
It took
humans
10, 000 years to learn how to
grow
most of the
crops
we
now
take for granted. Along the way, we despoiled most of the land we worked,
frequently
turning verdant,
natural
colones into semi-arid deserts. Within that same time frame, we evolved into an
urban
species, in which 60% of the
human
population
now
lives
vertically
in cities. This means that, for the majority, we
humans
have shelter from the elements,
yet
we subject our food-bearing
plants
to the rigors of the great outdoors and can do no more than hope for a
good
weather
year
.
However
, more
often
than not
now
, due to a
rapidly
changing climate,
that is
not what happens. Massive floods, long droughts, hurricanes and severe monsoons take their toll each
year
, destroying millions of tons of valuable crops.
The supporters of
vertical
farming
claim a
number
of potential advantages for the
system
.
For instance
,
crops
would
be produced
all
year
round, as they would be
kept
in
artificially
controlled, optimum growing conditions. There would be no weather-related
crop
failures due to droughts, floods or pests. All the
food
could
be grown
organically
, eliminating the
need
for herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers. The
system
would
greatly
reduce
the incidence of numerous infectious diseases that
are acquired
at the agricultural interface. Although the
system
would consume
energy
, it would return
energy
to the grid via methane generation from composting non-edible parts of
plants
. It would
also
dramatically
reduce
fossil fuel
use
, by cutting out the
need
for tractors, plows and shipping.
A major drawback of
vertical
farming
,
however
, is that the
plants
would require artificial
light
. Without it, those
plants
nearest the windows would
be exposed
to more sunlight and
grow
more
quickly
, reducing the efficiency of the
system
. Single
storey
greenhouses have the benefit of
natural
overhead
light
: even
consequently
, a
number
of
still
need
artificial lighting. A multistory facility with no
natural
overhead
light
would require far more. Generating
abundance
light
could be
prohibitively
expensive, unless
cheap
, renewable
energy
is available, and this appears to be
rather
a future aspiration than a likelihood for the near future.
One variation on
vertical
farming
that has
been developed
is to
grow
plants
in stacked trays that
move
on rails. Moving the trays
allows
the
plants
to
get
abundance
sunlight. This
system
is already in operation, and works well within a single
storey
greenhouse with
light
reaching it from above: it is not certain,
however
, that it can
be made
to work without that overhead
natural
light.
Vertical
farming
is an attempt to address the undoubted problems that we face in producing
abundance
food
for a growing
population
. At the moment, though, more
needs
to
be done
to
reduce
the detrimental impact it would have on the environment,
particularly
as regards the
use
of
energy
. While it is possible that much of our
food
will
be grown
in skyscrapers in the future, most experts
currently
believe it is far more likely that we will
simply
use
the space available on
urban
rooftops.