Some individuals contend that a prolonged average working hours of citizens could allow the state to have better economic development compared with nations which have shorter office hours. I completely agree with this argument.
To begin with, longer office hours can be beneficial to the cities. Citizenry staying in workplace for longer time will have a higher salaries. Many companies pay workers according to their working time so those who work for longer or even stay overnight in the office can earn more. For example, nurses in US can have triple the hourly wage rate than original if they work for extra hours. Higher salaries of city dwellers implies that they have more savings, spending more on consumer goods like food, electronic gadgets, clothing. Thus, the expenditure of citizens will go to the companies so it will reinvest their income into the society. Consequently, the state will have more thriving economic growth due to the huge consumer spending.
In addition, longer working hours can train citizen’s durability and this can motivate them to be more hard working. For example, Hong Kong is one of the city with longest working hours in the world, rated as one of the most competitive city in world. People who live in Hong Kong already get used to long working hours and overtime working is so common in there. Therefore, they treat 10 hours working as normal situation so civilians there are so hard working. Working overnight is even a culture in some of the financial industries in Hong Kong such as investment banking and audit. It is the endurable personality of residents trained through a decade that makes Hong kong a international financial center, being one of the most economically developed place.
In conclusion, there are many advantages in terms of economic boosting for citizenry to stay longer in the workplace so I totally agree that lengthy working hours can make a state more economically competitive.
Some
individuals contend that a prolonged average
working
hours
of citizens could
allow
the state to have better economic development compared with nations which have shorter office
hours
. I completely
agree
with this argument.
To
begin
with,
longer
office
hours
can be beneficial to the
cities
. Citizenry staying in workplace for
longer
time will have a higher salaries.
Many
companies
pay workers according to their
working
time
so
those who work for
longer
or even stay overnight in the office can earn more.
For example
, nurses in US can have triple the hourly wage rate than original if they work for extra
hours
. Higher salaries of city dwellers implies that they have more savings, spending more on consumer
goods
like food, electronic gadgets, clothing.
Thus
, the expenditure of citizens will go to the
companies
so
it will reinvest their income into the society.
Consequently
, the state will have more thriving economic growth due to the huge consumer spending.
In addition
,
longer
working
hours
can train citizen’s durability and this can motivate them to be more
hard
working
.
For example
, Hong Kong is one of the city with
longest
working
hours
in the world, rated as one of the most competitive city in world.
People
who
live
in Hong Kong already
get
used
to long
working
hours
and overtime
working
is
so
common in there.
Therefore
, they treat 10
hours
working
as normal situation
so
civilians there are
so
hard
working
.
Working
overnight is even a culture in
some of the
financial industries in Hong Kong such as investment banking and audit. It is the endurable personality of residents trained through a decade that
makes
Hong kong
a
international financial center, being one of the most
economically
developed place.
In conclusion
, there are
many
advantages in terms of economic boosting for citizenry to stay
longer
in the workplace
so
I
totally
agree
that lengthy
working
hours
can
make
a state more
economically
competitive.