Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Countries are becoming more and more similar becase people are able to buy

Countries are becoming more and more similar becase people are able to buy kjxqe

Some psychologists claim that countries has became similar to each other because nowadays people are able to purchase the same products anywhere in the world. This transition has some positive and some negative aspects. It can be considered as a progress if we believe that equipments and social welfare should spread equally around the world but if we think about it deeply, we may feel a mishap. First of all, each country and nation should have their own culture, lifestyle and identity. These factors are reflected in their tastes for buying clothes, home furniture and other products which they need for their life. Furthermore, Ignoring their local preferences can easily leads to culture merging and integrated identities and has a great deal of damages on tourism and anthropological studies. On the other hand, many ordinary people are unaware of these long-lasting side effects and assume accessing to the same products and services as a privilege. We can not deny some parts of this fact actually. So it is a responsibility of governments to fix some rules about the minority of facilities for people to buy the same products anywhere in the world. But media should inform the mass about its negative points too. In conclusion, today because of wide range of using international trading websites, it is really common for two person from two completely far countries to buy a same product and access to the same services. Definitely it is every person’s right to have same facilities but its drawback in culture and lifestyle should not be ignored.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 psychologists claim that countries has Use past participle here: "become".become
became
 similar to each other This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 nowadays This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 are able to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
purchase
 the same You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 anywhere in the world. This transition has This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 aspects. It can be considered
 as a progress if we believe that equipments and social welfare should spread equally
 around the world This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 if we This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 about it deeply
, we may feel a mishap.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, each country and nation should have their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 culture, lifestyle and identity. These factors are reflected
 in their tastes for buying clothes, home furniture and other You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 which they need for their life. Furthermore
, Ignoring their local preferences can easily
 leads to culture merging and integrated identities and has a great deal of damages on tourism and anthropological studies.

On the other hand
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 ordinary This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 are unaware of these long-lasting side effects and assume accessing to the same You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 and services as a privilege. We can not deny This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 parts of this fact actually. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
 it is a responsibility of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :rectify
fix
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
 about the minority of facilities for This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 the same You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 anywhere in the world. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
 media should inform the mass about its This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 points too.

In conclusion
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :this day and agenowadays
today
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of wide range of using international trading websites, it is really
 common for two Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: "people", "persons".peoplepersons
person
 from two completely far countries to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 a same You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
product
 and access to the same services. Definitely it is every person’s right to have same facilities This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 its drawback in culture and lifestyle should not be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :neglected
ignored
. 