In my opinion the statement is a Dialectic method because it stated there that a number of people are saying that coronavirus is intentionally built in a laboratory, while others say that we are now facing world war III and China was winning due to the fact that all countries around the world are suffering from this illness. In the lecture, we can see the definition of dialectic method is somehow similar to debate but with a different concept because it excludes subjective elements like emotional appeal. The background of Coronavirus is quite questionable due to the fact that China was the first ever country that made a vaccine. It is not subjective owing to the fact that we can absolutely conclude that something is fishy about this disease especially a number of experts said that this illness is not really related to the bat that they claimed the origin of the virus.
However, a study about Coronavirus proved that this virus indeed came from the bat because there is a history of two major coronavirus outbreaks: SARS and MERS. That’s why we cannot say that this virus came from the laboratory or this is a bioweapon, and we are facing world war III and China is winning. China is also one of the countries that are affected by this pandemic, and they spend millions of dollars to keep Chinese people safe from the disease. Therefore, the assumption that others are claiming is purely an opinion owing to the evidence that the science itself already proven that these outbreaks was naturally caused and not through the process of bio engineering.
In my opinion the statement is a Dialectic method
because
it stated there that a number of
people
are saying that coronavirus is
intentionally
built in a laboratory, while others say that we are
now
facing world war III and China was winning due to the fact that all countries around the world are suffering from this illness. In the lecture, we can
see
the definition of dialectic method is somehow similar to debate
but
with a
different
concept
because
it excludes subjective elements like emotional appeal. The background of Coronavirus is quite questionable due to the fact that China was the
first
ever country that made a vaccine. It is not subjective owing to the fact that we can
absolutely
conclude that something is fishy about this disease
especially
a number of experts said that this illness is not
really
related to the bat that they claimed the origin of the virus.
However
, a study about Coronavirus proved that this virus
indeed
came from the bat
because
there is a history of two major coronavirus outbreaks: SARS and MERS. That’s why we cannot say that this virus came from the laboratory or this is a bioweapon, and we are facing world war III and China is winning. China is
also
one of the countries that are
affected
by this pandemic, and they spend millions of dollars to
keep
Chinese
people
safe from the disease.
Therefore
, the assumption that others are claiming is
purely
an opinion owing to the evidence that the science itself already proven that these outbreaks was
naturally
caused and not through the process of bio engineering.