Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Concerning for environment growing and more and more people choose recycle. Others people argue that the recycle is not enough. They suggest we need to consume less. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.

Concerning for environment growing and more and more people choose recycle. Others people argue that the recycle is not enough. They suggest we need to consume less. PVR3w

Recent years, growing of concern for environment increased and vast number of people opt recycle method. Others, however, plead that recycling of waste is not sufficient and give suggestion about less consumption of things. This essay will discuss both sides of arguments in detail and draw a conclusion. Apparently, the majority of people prefer reprocess method to tackle environmental problems. They believe reuse of things can reduce environment pollution. These days, people use goods and throw it in environment so the pollution increased. Instead of throwing things on the street, this item if reuse then pollution decrease. Also, people earn money from it. For instance, in India many railway stations installed recycle machines, where people throw plastic bottles and earn money from it. Therefore, recycle method not only reduce environmental problems but people can save and earn money. Nevertheless, others assert that recycle method is not adequate to solve environmental problems and they suggest that the less squandering of goods. They believe that in recycling method energy used to make things reuse. However, energy produces from fuel so the pollution is automatically increasing. In contrast, if people use plenty of things then environmental problems reduce. For instance, recent survey shown that if people consume less things then goods making industries reduce its production so the environment pollution decrease. Thus, less consumption of things more benefited to reduce pollution. In my opinion, I think not only less consumption of products but also a recycling method both can reduce environmental problems. If people utilise sufficient goods and reuse these things more time then environment related problems decrease. To conclude, people have different views to tackle environmental problems as use recycle method or consume less. I opine that enough utilisation with recycled method reduce environmental problems.

Recent years, growing of concern for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
 increased and vast number of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 opt You use this word too often, consider replacing it withconvert
recycle
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstylepracticeformhabitprocessrule
method
. Others, however
, plead that recycling of waste is not sufficient and give suggestion about You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfewer
less
 consumption of things. This essay will discuss both sides of arguments in detail and draw a conclusion.

Apparently
, the majority of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 prefer reprocess You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstylepracticeformhabitprocessrule
method
 to tackle You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
. They believe You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrestate
reuse
 of things can You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
. These days, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withequipmentpropertyfurnishingsfurniture
goods
 and throw it in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 increased. Instead
 of throwing things on the street, this item if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrestate
reuse
 then You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 decrease. Also
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 earn money from it. For instance
, in India This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 railway stations installed You use this word too often, consider replacing it withconvert
recycle
 machines, where You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 throw plastic bottles and earn money from it. Therefore
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withconvert
recycle
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstylepracticeformhabitprocessrule
method
 not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 can save and earn money.

Nevertheless
, others assert that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withconvert
recycle
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstylepracticeformhabitprocessrule
method
 is not adequate to solve You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).problems, and
problems and
 they suggest that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfewer
less
 squandering of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withequipmentpropertyfurnishingsfurniture
goods
. They believe that in recycling You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstylepracticeformhabitprocessrule
method
 energy This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 things You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrestate
reuse
. However
, energy produces from fuel This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 is automatically
 increasing. In contrast
, if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
plenty
 of things then You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
. For instance
, recent survey shown that if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 consume Did you mean "less things than"?less things than
less things then
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withequipmentpropertyfurnishingsfurniture
goods
 making industries You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
 its production This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 decrease. Thus
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfewer
less
 consumption of things more benefited to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
 pollution.

In my opinion, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfewer
less
 consumption of products This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 a recycling You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstylepracticeformhabitprocessrule
method
 both can You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
. If You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
Possible spelling mistake. 'utilise' is British English.utilize
utilise
 sufficient You use this word too often, consider replacing it withequipmentpropertyfurnishingsfurniture
goods
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrestate
reuse
 these things more time Did you mean "than"?than
then
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
 related You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
 decrease.

To conclude
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 have This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 views to tackle You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
 as This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withconvert
recycle
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstylepracticeformhabitprocessrule
method
 or consume You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfewer
less
. I opine that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
enough
Possible spelling mistake. 'utilisation' is British English.utilization
utilisation
 with recycled You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstylepracticeformhabitprocessrule
method
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
. 