Maglev represents new technology: magnetic levitation and linear induction motor(LIM) propulsion. Clearly, to be deployed, a system must be physically and operationally feasible not only under controlled conditions, but also in permanent operation under “real world” conditions. This includes such external factors as public reaction, handling crowded conditions, adverse weather, incidental occurrences of technical defects, short power interruptions, etc. While high-speed maglev infrastructure is relatively expensive to build, maglev trains are less expensive to operate and maintain than traditional high-speed trains or planes. At higher speeds, most of the power needed is used to overcome air drag. Maglev systems can operate at very high speeds almost without deterioration and are therefore more economical to operate than wheel/rail rapid transit systems that require regular intensive maintenance and experience exponentially increasing erosion with increasing speed. The fundamental freedom from mechanical erosion is one of the main advantages of maglev high-speed systems. Maglev is the only track-bound transport system that has practically no mechanical friction during operation. In maglev, all the weight, propulsion and lateral guidance forces of the vehicle are transferred contact-free to the guideway, including the braking forces. As a result, maintenance costs of some maglev systems are only a fraction of the costs of traditional wheel/rail systems. In traditional wheel/rail operations, the wheels eventually wear out. In addition, the resultant grit on the running surface of the tracks causes abrasion of the railheads. Maglev guide paths are bound to be more costly than conventional steel railways. The other main disadvantage is the lack of existing infrastructure. For example, if a highspeed line between two cities is built, then high speed trains can serve both cities but more importantly they can serve other nearby cities by running on normal railways that branch off the highspeed line. The highspeed trains could go for a fast run on the highspeed line, then come off it for the rest of the journey. Maglev trains wouldn’t be able to do that as they would be limited to where maglev lines run. This would mean it would be very difficult to make construction of maglev lines commercially viable unless there were two very large destinations being connected. Of the 5000 km that TGV trains serve in France, only about 1200 km is high speed line, meaning 75% of TGV services run on existing track. The fact that a maglev train will not be able to continue beyond its track may seriously hinder its usefulness.
Maglev
represents new technology: magnetic levitation and linear induction motor(LIM) propulsion.
Clearly
, to
be deployed
, a
system
must
be
physically
and
operationally
feasible not
only
under controlled conditions,
but
also
in permanent operation under “real world” conditions. This includes such external factors as public reaction, handling crowded conditions, adverse weather, incidental occurrences of technical defects, short power interruptions, etc. While
high-speed
maglev
infrastructure is
relatively
expensive to build,
maglev
trains
are less expensive to operate and maintain than traditional
high-speed
trains
or
planes
. At higher
speeds
, most of the power needed is
used
to overcome air drag.
Maglev
systems
can operate at
very
high
speeds
almost without deterioration and are
therefore
more economical to operate than wheel/rail rapid transit
systems
that require regular intensive maintenance and experience
exponentially
increasing erosion with increasing
speed
. The fundamental freedom from mechanical erosion is one of the main advantages of
maglev
high-speed
systems
.
Maglev
is the
only
track
-bound transport
system
that has
practically
no mechanical friction during operation. In
maglev
, all the weight, propulsion and lateral guidance forces of the vehicle
are transferred
contact-free to the
guideway
, including the braking forces.
As a result
, maintenance costs of
some
maglev
systems
are
only
a fraction of the costs of traditional wheel/rail
systems
. In traditional wheel/rail operations, the wheels
eventually
wear out.
In addition
, the resultant grit on the running surface of the
tracks
causes abrasion of the
railheads
.
Maglev
guide paths
are bound
to be more costly than conventional steel railways. The other main disadvantage is the lack of existing infrastructure.
For example
, if a
highspeed
line
between two cities
is built
, then high
speed
trains
can serve both cities
but
more
importantly
they can serve other nearby cities by running on normal railways that branch off the
highspeed
line
. The
highspeed
trains
could go for a
fast
run on the
highspeed
line
, then
come
off it for the rest of the journey.
Maglev
trains
wouldn’t be able to do that as they would
be limited
to where
maglev
lines
run. This would mean it would be
very
difficult to
make
construction of
maglev
lines
commercially
viable unless there were two
very
large destinations
being connected
. Of the 5000 km that TGV
trains
serve in France,
only
about 1200 km is high
speed
line
, meaning 75% of TGV services run on existing
track
. The fact that a
maglev
train
will not be able to continue beyond its
track
may
seriously
hinder its usefulness.