Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Compare and contrast; communism and capitalism

Compare and contrast; communism and capitalism 3bxOw
The debate between communism and capitalism is a contest between two radical socioeconomic philosophies. They are two ideas that reflect two fundamentally opposing ways of thinking about the same thing. One is particularly individualistic (Capitalism), whilst the other (Communism) believes in placing the needs of the community ahead of one's own. During the Cold War, the conflict between communism and capitalism split the whole globe. Capitalism and communism essentially differ in their approach to the ownership of'means of production' or resources in general. Communism is opposed to private/individual ownership of land or other critical resources. Rather than that, the state should own all'means of production, ' such as land and other natural resources. All land and resources necessary to produce goods and services will be commonly shared. Everything is shared. All production choices will be democratically chosen by the whole community. All workers will get the same salary. All choices will be made with the common good in mind. Capitalism, on the other hand, believes in private ownership of land and productive assets. Each individual must prove his value. The majority of profits made by a brand will go to the owner of the means of production, while the employees who manage the business will get a little portion. Each worker will get a pay check proportional to their ability and the thinking of the guy who controls the means of production. Therefore, when it comes to decision-making, the people who control the means of production, the capitalists, call the shots. Communism appeals to our heroic side, where we put others first. It's a wonderful idea that goes against people's basic selfishness while appealing to their generosity. Both extremes offer benefits and drawbacks. Some of the greatest breakthroughs in human history came from self-serving creativity and business that eventually benefitted society. Communism may kill creativity by forcing people to do what they are instructed. In short, it may destroy creativeness. However, capitalism may develop into a system of capitalist authoritarian leaders who govern thousands of people's lives, resulting in injustice. Communism promotes a classless, gender-neutral society. No class, race, religion, or even nationality will exist. So there's nothing to fight for. This is a good concept, but executing it is difficult and expecting individuals to give up their differences is harsh. Everyone is unique and distinct. In contrast, capitalism creates a class divide. In reality, it produces the primary class division between the wealthy and the poor. Pure capitalism makes the wealthiest wealthier and the poor poorer. By controlling production and power, the wealthy class enforces their own class differences and preferences on society. Communism encourages charity, whereas capitalism encourages selfishness. Consider the power distribution in both ideologies. Meanwhile, capitalism generally concentrates money and power in the hands of the producers. The rich and powerful dominate wealth, resources, and power. So they naturally determine power distribution. Power would be distributed equally under communism if everyone was saintly, noble, and selfless. All choices would be democratic, with no unfair regulations favoring a few. However, individuals are naturally greedy, and power corrupts minds, and absolute power corrupts totally. Both capitalism and communism aim for the same end result, and they both claim that their different distributions of resources will lead to the same result in the long run. Despite the fact that capitalism seems to be the more advanced system in this sense, both systems require the allocation of resources. They are both responsible for assigning resources to carry out production. It is simply the case that one system is more efficient at assigning funds than the other. Their objectives are centered on growth. In my opinion, Communism is a better economic system because it is a society in which everyone has an equal share of everything, workers have complete control over the means of production, and the state has faded. Nobody goes hungry in this seeming paradise; everyone gets a place to live, appropriate health care, and everything else they choose. Nobody is bothered by jealousy since no one earns more than another, or is stronger or better.
The debate between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communism
and capitalism is a contest between two radical socioeconomic philosophies. They are two
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ideas
that reflect two
fundamentally
opposing ways of thinking about the same thing. One is
particularly
individualistic (Capitalism), whilst the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
(Communism)
believes in placing the needs of the community ahead of one's
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
. During the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Cold
War, the conflict between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communism
and capitalism split the whole globe. Capitalism and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communism
essentially
differ in their approach to the ownership of'means of production' or resources
in general
.

Communism
is opposed
to private/individual ownership of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
land
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
critical resources.
Rather
than that, the state should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
all'means of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
,
Don't put a space on both sides of a quote symbol
'
such as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
land
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
natural resources. All
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
land
and resources necessary to produce
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
and services will be
commonly
shared. Everything
is shared
. All
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
choices will be
democratically
chosen by the whole community. All workers will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
the same salary.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
All
choices will
be made
with the common
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
in mind.

Capitalism, on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, believes in private ownership of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
land
and productive assets. Each individual
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
prove his value. The majority of profits made by a brand will go to the owner of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
means
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
, while the employees
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
manage the business will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
portion. Each worker will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
a pay
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
proportional to their ability and the thinking of the guy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
controls the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
means
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
.
Therefore
, when it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
comes
to decision-making, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
control the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
means
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
, the capitalists, call the shots.

Communism appeals to our heroic side, where we put others
first
. It's a wonderful
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
that goes against
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
's basic selfishness while appealing to their generosity. Both extremes offer benefits and drawbacks.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
of the greatest breakthroughs in human history came from self-serving creativity and business that
eventually
Possible spelling mistake found.
benefitted
society.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Communism
may kill creativity by forcing
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to do what they
are instructed
. In short, it may
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroy
creativeness.
However
, capitalism may develop into a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
system
of capitalist authoritarian leaders
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
govern thousands of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
's
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
, resulting in injustice.

Communism promotes a classless, gender-neutral society. No
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
, race, religion, or even nationality will exist.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
there's nothing to fight for. This is a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
concept,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
executing it is difficult and expecting individuals to give up their differences is harsh.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Everyone
is unique and distinct.
In contrast
, capitalism creates a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
divide. In reality, it produces the primary
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
division between the wealthy and the poor. Pure capitalism
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
the wealthiest wealthier and the poor poorer. By controlling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
, the wealthy
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
enforces their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
differences and preferences on society.

Communism encourages charity, whereas capitalism encourages selfishness. Consider the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
distribution in both ideologies. Meanwhile, capitalism
generally
concentrates money and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
in the hands of the producers. The rich and powerful dominate wealth, resources, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
they
naturally
determine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
distribution.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Power
would
be distributed
equally
under
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communism
if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
everyone
was
saintly
, noble, and selfless. All choices would be democratic, with no unfair regulations favoring a few.
However
, individuals are
naturally
greedy, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
corrupts minds, and absolute
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
corrupts
totally
.

Both capitalism and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communism
aim for the same
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
result, and they both claim that their
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
distributions of resources will lead to the same result in the long run. Despite the fact that capitalism seems to be the more advanced
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
system
in this sense, both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
systems
require the allocation of resources. They are both responsible for assigning resources to carry out
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
. It is
simply
the case that one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
system
is more efficient at assigning funds than the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
. Their objectives
are centered
on growth.

In my opinion,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Communism
is a better economic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
system
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is a society in which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
everyone
has an equal share of everything, workers have complete control over the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
means
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
, and the state has faded. Nobody goes hungry in this seeming paradise;
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
everyone
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
gets
a place to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
, appropriate health care, and everything else they choose. Nobody
is bothered
by jealousy since no one earns more than another, or is stronger or better.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Compare and contrast; communism and capitalism

Essay
  American English
8 paragraphs
677 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Compare and contrast; communism and capitalism