Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

compaison of energy production in 1995 and 2005.

compaison of energy production in 1995 and 2005. 0M9kG

The given circular outline demonstrates the comparison shown in well organised way which illustrates the difference of energy production in 1995 and 2005. Looking from the overall prospective the circular outline provides an information about energy production. In 1995 the main accomodities are coal, gas, petro as well as others a part from it in 2005 the production of coal, gas, petro, nuclear or others which reveals in logical system. It is crystal clear data for abdunt of accommodaties as show the coal slightly 29. 80% however In 1995 as compare to 2005 coal production 30. 93%. Moreover the gas shown minimal difference 29. 63%in 1995 as compare to gas as 30. 31% In 2005. further more other things refers to 4. 90%. Moving towards petro and nuclear productivity show the elastic differences ad in 1995 the nuclear 6. 40%respectively in 2005 nuclear develops rapidly as 10. 10%. Moreover petro 29. 27%in 1995 which was irrelevant Diffentriate in petro of 2005 as indicate 19. 55%.

The This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 circular outline demonstrates the comparison shown in This word is normally spelled with hyphen.well-organised
well organised
 way which illustrates the difference of energy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanufacturemanagementconstructionmanufacturing
production
 in 1995 and 2005. Looking from the overall
 prospective the circular outline provides an information about energy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanufacturemanagementconstructionmanufacturing
production
. In 1995 the main Possible spelling mistake found.commoditiesaccommodates
accomodities
 are coal, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gas
, Possible spelling mistake found.metroPedroretroPetrapetrolPietro
petro
as well
 as others a part from it in 2005 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanufacturemanagementconstructionmanufacturing
production
 of coal, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gas
, Possible spelling mistake found.metroPedroretroPetrapetrolPietro
petro
, nuclear or others which reveals in logical system. It is crystal This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 data for Possible spelling mistake found.abduct
abdunt
 of Possible spelling mistake found.accommodates
accommodaties
 as This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstrateportrayindicatedisplay
show
 the coal slightly
 29. 80% however
 In 1995 as compare to 2005 coal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanufacturemanagementconstructionmanufacturing
production
 30. 93%. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Moreover,
Moreover
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gas
 shown minimal difference 29. 63%in 1995 as compare to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gas
 as 30. 31% In 2005. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterFurther
further
 more other things refers to 4. 90%. Moving towards Possible spelling mistake found.metroPedroretroPetrapetrolPietro
petro
 and nuclear productivity This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstrateportrayindicatedisplay
show
 the elastic Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "differences'" or "difference's"?differences'difference's
differences
 ad in 1995 the nuclear 6. 40%respectively
 in 2005 nuclear develops rapidly
 as 10. 10%. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Moreover,
Moreover
Possible spelling mistake found.metroPedroretroPetrapetrolPietro
petro
 29. 27%in 1995 which was irrelevant Possible spelling mistake found.Differentiate
Diffentriate
 in Possible spelling mistake found.metroPedroretroPetrapetrolPietro
petro
 of 2005 as indicate 19. 55%. 