Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Communication through text messaging and other instant forms of online communication are short and basic. Some people think this will be death of grammar and spelling. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Social apps and SMS are enormously being used to interact with each other nowadays. People usually type small sentences and words on these apps, which makes others assume that this is gradually killing language rules. I do not support their stance as this is only happening in a few circumstances. Firstly, a language can not perish if some individuals incorrectly type it to communicate with others via messages. They purposely do it to save their time and convey their message simultaneously, and by no means are intended to disrespect a terminology. Some native English speakers, for instance, have learned their mother tongue and have been accustomed to speaking it since their childhood and simply by writing it without using an auxiliary verb or leaving a silent letter from a certain word can not make them forget the grammars or spellings, such as typing the word 'often' like 'open', because they need to speak and write their tongue for formal uses. Therefore, typing a short message can not damage the dialect itself as it is just an individual act. Secondly, not everyone prefers to communicate by ignoring the syntax. Some people choose to use call options over messages and even if they text someone, they type complete sentences. To illustrate this, some businessmen are too busy to send a text message and would give a phone call instead to receive a prompt reply. Hence, his jargon will be saved from any harm. Similarly, a teacher would always regard a speech policy even in a short text and would expect the same in return. Thus, his services would always favour his mother tongue instead. To conclude, e-messages are done by some people in a short and quick way in which grammars and spellings are sometimes neglected, and some persons opine that this can harm the language itself. I, nonetheless, suppose their stance, because a person who speaks a jargon every day can never forget it even if it is used in little phrases for the reason of time-saving and because not everyone does this act. Spellings and grammars of any particular dialect are pre-set rules and can no be spoiled by its users I believe.

Social apps and SMS are enormously
 being This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to interact with each other nowadays. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
People
usually
 type This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
 sentences and words on these apps, which This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createsconstructsmanufacturesproduces
makes
 others assume that this is gradually
 killing language This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
. I do not support their stance as this is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 happening in a few circumstances.

Firstly
, a language can not perish if This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 individuals incorrectly
 type it to communicate with others via You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinformationnoticeworddirectivememomemorandum
messages
. They purposely
 do it to save their time and convey their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinformationnoticeworddirectivememomemorandum
message
simultaneously
, and by no means are intended
 to disrespect a terminology. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 native English speakers, for instance
, have learned their mother tongue and have been accustomed
 to speaking it since their childhood and simply
 by writing it without using an auxiliary verb or leaving a silent letter from a certain word can not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 them forget the grammars or spellings, such as typing the word 'This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:frequently
often
' like 'open', This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 they need to speak and write their tongue for formal This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploits
uses
. Therefore
, typing a short You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinformationnoticeworddirectivememomemorandum
message
 can not damage the dialect itself as it is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 an individual act.

Secondly
, not everyone prefers to communicate by ignoring the syntax. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 choose to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 call options over You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinformationnoticeworddirectivememomemorandum
messages
 and even if they text someone, they type complete sentences. To illustrate this, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 businessmen are too busy to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :transmit
send
 a text You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinformationnoticeworddirectivememomemorandum
message
 and would give a phone call instead
 to receive a prompt reply. Hence
, his jargon will be saved
 from any harm. Similarly
, a teacher would always regard a speech policy even in a short text and would This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :anticipate
expect
 the same in return. Thus
, his services would always Possible spelling mistake. ‘favour’ is British English.favor
favour
 his mother tongue instead
.

To conclude
, e-messages are done
 by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in a short and quick way in which grammars and spellings are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :in some instances
sometimes
 neglected, and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 persons opine that this can harm the language itself. I, nonetheless, suppose their stance, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 a person who speaks a jargon every day can never forget it even if it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
little
 phrases for the reason of time-saving and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 not everyone does this act. Spellings and grammars of any particular dialect are Possible spelling mistake found.preset
pre-set
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
 and can In this context, the correct negation is “not”.not
no
be spoiled
 by its users I believe. 