Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Climate change is now an accepted threat to our planet, but there is not enough action to control its causes such as burning fossil fuels, cutting down rainforests and farming livestock. Do you agree?

Climate change is now an accepted threat to our planet, but there is not enough action to control its causes such as burning fossil fuels, cutting down rainforests and farming livestock. Do you agree? j9NYw
Climate change represents a major threat to life on Earth, but some people argue that we need to accept it rather than try to stop it. I completely disagree with this opinion, because I believe that we still have time to tackle this issue and reduce the human impact on the Earth's climate. There are various measures that governments and individuals could take to prevent, or at least mitigate, climate change. Governments could introduce laws to limit the carbon dioxide emissions that lead to global warming. They could impose “green taxes” on drivers, airline companies and other polluters, and they could invest in renewable energy production from solar, wind or water power. As individuals, we should also try to limit our contribution to climate change, by becoming more energy efficient, by flying less, and by using bicycles and public transport. Furthermore, the public can affect the actions of governments by voting for politicians who propose to tackle climate change, rather than for those who would prefer to ignore it. If instead of taking the above measures we simply try to live with climate change, I believe that the consequences will be disastrous. To give just one example, I am not optimistic that we would be able to cope with even a small rise in sea levels. Millions of people would be displaced by flooding, particularly in countries that do not have the means to safeguard low-lying areas. These people would lose their homes and their jobs, and they would be forced to migrate to nearby cities or perhaps to other countries. The potential for human suffering would be huge, and it is likely that we would see outbreaks of disease and famine, as well as increased homelessness and poverty. In conclusion, it is clear to me that we must address the problem of climate change, and I disagree with those who argue that we can find ways to live with it.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Climate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
change
represents a major threat to life on Earth,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
argue that we need to accept it
rather
than try to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
it. I completely disagree with this opinion,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
I believe that we
still
have time to tackle this issue and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the human impact on the Earth's climate.

There are various measures that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
and individuals could take to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
, or at least mitigate,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
climate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
change
.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Governments
could introduce laws to limit the carbon dioxide emissions that lead to global warming. They could impose “green taxes” on drivers, airline
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
and other polluters, and they could invest in renewable energy production from solar, wind or water power. As individuals, we should
also
try to limit our contribution to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
climate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
change
, by becoming more energy efficient, by flying less, and by using bicycles and public transport.
Furthermore
, the public can affect the actions of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
by voting for politicians who propose to tackle
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
climate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
change
,
rather
than for those who would prefer to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ignore
it.

If
instead
of taking the above measures we
simply
try to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
climate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
change
, I believe that the consequences will be disastrous. To give
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
one example, I am not optimistic that we would be able to cope with even a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
rise in sea levels. Millions of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
would
be displaced
by flooding,
particularly
in countries that do not have the means to safeguard low-lying areas. These
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
would lose their homes and their jobs, and they would
be forced
to migrate to nearby cities or perhaps to other countries. The potential for human suffering would be huge, and it is likely that we would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
outbreaks of disease and famine,
as well
as increased homelessness and poverty.

In conclusion
, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
to me that we
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
address the problem of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
climate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
change
, and I disagree with those who argue that we can find ways to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
with it.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Climate change is now an accepted threat to our planet, but there is not enough action to control its causes such as burning fossil fuels, cutting down rainforests and farming livestock. Do you agree?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
321 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts