It is usually thought that all children should stay at institute until the age of eighteen. Although staying at school until adulthood can produce a figure benefits, I personally disagree with this idea for a number of reasons, which will be outlined in this essay.
On the one hand, the idea that children should continue to study at institution until the youth of eighteen does have a number of benefits. Firstly, most young people under the age of eighteen have very little real-world experience and have an extremely little intention of what career they will pursue, and therefore staying at school until the age of eighteen will allow them further opportunity to develop their education and time to decide upon a suitable career path. Furthermore, forcing children to stay at seminary until the youth of eighteen will create a more educated future generation of people which may help to reduce some social and unemployment problems.
On the other hand, there is also a figure of drawbacks that this idea may bring with it. For instance, many children these days do not fit-in with the current education system and forcing them to participate in school can cause many problems. For example, these kinds of students are usually exactly disruptive in a classroom and this affects other students who are trying to learn. In addition to this, many children choose to follow careers that do not require them to continue studying in school past the age of sixteen. For example, for those who wish to pursue a career that requires more practical based learning, such as a qualified builder, electrician or machinery operator, it is quite unnecessary to remain at academy until the age of eighteen.
By way of conclusion, recently, however, there would be a number of positive effects of children remaining in school until a later age. From my perspective, feel that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits mentioned above.
It is
usually
thought
that all
children
should stay at institute until the
age
of eighteen. Although staying at
school
until adulthood can produce a figure benefits, I
personally
disagree with this
idea
for a number of reasons, which will
be outlined
in this essay.
On the one hand, the
idea
that
children
should continue to study at institution until the youth of eighteen does have a number of benefits.
Firstly
, most young
people
under the
age
of eighteen have
very
little
real-world experience and have an
extremely
little
intention of what
career
they will pursue, and
therefore
staying at
school
until the
age
of eighteen will
allow
them
further
opportunity to develop their education and time to decide upon a suitable
career
path.
Furthermore
, forcing
children
to stay at seminary until the youth of eighteen will create a more educated future generation of
people
which may
help
to
reduce
some
social and unemployment problems.
On the other hand
, there is
also
a figure of drawbacks that this
idea
may bring with it.
For instance
,
many
children
these days do not fit-in with the
current
education system and forcing them to participate in
school
can cause
many
problems.
For example
, these kinds of students are
usually
exactly disruptive in a classroom and this affects other students who are trying to learn.
In addition
to this,
many
children
choose to follow
careers
that do not require them to continue studying in
school
past the
age
of sixteen.
For example
, for those who wish to pursue a
career
that requires more practical based learning, such as a qualified builder, electrician or machinery operator, it is quite unnecessary to remain at academy until the
age
of eighteen.
By way of conclusion, recently,
however
, there would be a number of
positive
effects of
children
remaining in
school
until a later
age
. From my perspective, feel that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits mentioned above.