These days, watching television is undeniably one of the most favourite hobbies of children. But I strongly believe books can never be replaced by TV set as a means of learning gadget
I completely agree with the statement because the station is more for entertainment, not for training purposes. I will support my opinion with examples
Firstly, owing to the fact that children often misuse television in the disappearance of parents For instance, learning programs are less attractive compared the cartoon shows and it is expected that every child prefer to watch shows which are appealing to the senses.
Another reason why I agree box is not as suitable as a book because using books, children can research as long as they want with full attention and without any detrimental effect on their physique. On the other hand, watching the broadcast For a long time has a terrible impact on their physical development. Taken a recent research has reported that more than 70 percent of children go for cartoons and animated game series remaining absent-minded towards their studies.
I strongly believe that when children learn through the box, then their focus will be on audio-visual presentation, not in learning. What is more important that if children follow books they develop focus on lessons it offers. On the other hand the inclusion of projects and LEDs while teaching can make learning a fun activity However; it is a too expensive process to afford by the children from lower-class families.
In Conclusion, although television set is more entertaining than books, it cannot become a great tool for subject as books are for children.
Personally, I think the more time children spend on station is the less time they get for studying from books and thus impact the quality of their research
These days, watching television is
undeniably
one of the most
favourite
hobbies of
children
.
But
I
strongly
believe
books
can never
be replaced
by TV set as a means of
learning
gadget
I completely
agree
with the statement
because
the station is more for entertainment, not for training purposes. I will support my opinion with
examples
Firstly
, owing to the fact that
children
often
misuse television in the disappearance of parents
For instance
,
learning
programs are less attractive compared the cartoon
shows
and it is
expected
that every child prefer to
watch
shows
which are appealing to the senses.
Another reason why I
agree
box is not as suitable as a
book
because
using
books
,
children
can research as long as they want with full attention and without any detrimental effect on their physique.
On the other hand
, watching the broadcast For a long time has a terrible impact on their physical development. Taken a recent research has reported that more than 70 percent of
children
go for cartoons and animated game series remaining absent-minded towards their studies.
I
strongly
believe that when
children
learn through the box, then their focus will be on audio-visual presentation, not in
learning
.
What is more
important
that if
children
follow
books
they develop focus on lessons it offers.
On the other hand
the inclusion of projects and LEDs while teaching can
make
learning
a fun activity
However
; it is a too expensive process to afford by the
children
from lower-
class
families.
In Conclusion
, although television set is more entertaining than
books
, it cannot become a great tool for subject as
books
are for children.
Personally
, I
think
the more time
children
spend on station is the less time they
get
for studying from
books
and
thus
impact the quality of their research
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
19Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes