In the following graphic, information about Canadian donors is shown. Relevant comparisons can be identified from it. The principal variable we can highlight is the age group, The second one is a comparison of the years 2000 and 2015.
A surprising change, if we compared 2000 and 2015 is how a younger group (35 to 49) seem to stop giving money or at least there was a considerable decrease in the amount of it. On the other hand, an older group (52 to 64) got more interested as the years passed. The past two statements have the higher percentage of the graphic from 34% to 39% approximately and viceversa.
Additionally, the group with less donations, showing a percentage of just 20% in 2000 was the age range of 18 to 24. The previous data did not get better, it even had a decrease to 11% which can be an interesting topic for a future investigation.
In the following graphic, information about Canadian donors
is shown
. Relevant comparisons can
be identified
from it. The principal variable we can highlight is the age
group
, The second one is a comparison of the years 2000 and 2015.
A surprising
change
, if we compared 2000 and 2015 is how a younger
group
(35 to 49) seem to
stop
giving money or at least there was a considerable decrease in the amount of it.
On the other hand
, an older
group
(52 to 64)
got
more interested as the years passed. The past two statements have the higher percentage of the graphic from 34% to 39% approximately and
viceversa
.
Additionally
, the
group
with
less
donations, showing a percentage of
just
20% in 2000 was the age range of 18 to 24. The previous data did not
get
better, it even had a decrease to 11% which can be an interesting topic for a future investigation.