In the following graphic, information about Canadian donors is shown. Relevant comparisons can be identified from it. The principal variable we can highlight is the age group, The second one is a comparison of the years 2000 and 2015.
A surprising change, if we compared 2000 and 2015 is how a younger group (35 to 49) seem to stop giving money or at least there was a considerable decrease in the amount of it. On the other hand, an older group (52 to 64) got more interested as the years passed. The past two statements have the higher percentage of the graphic from 34% to 39% approximately and viceversa.
Additionally, the group with less donations, showing a percentage of just 20% in 2000 was the age range of 18 to 24. The previous data did not get better, it even had a decrease to 11% which can be an interesting topic for a future investigation. 
In the following graphic, information about Canadian donors  
is shown
. Relevant comparisons can  
be identified
 from it. The principal variable we can highlight is the age  
group
, The second one is a comparison of the years 2000 and 2015.
A surprising  
change
, if we compared 2000 and 2015 is how a younger  
group
 (35 to 49) seem to  
stop
 giving money or at least there was a considerable decrease in the amount of it.  
On the other hand
, an older  
group
 (52 to 64)  
got
 more interested as the years passed. The past two statements have the higher percentage of the graphic from 34% to 39% approximately and  
viceversa
. 
Additionally
, the  
group
 with  
less
 donations, showing a percentage of  
just
 20% in 2000 was the age range of 18 to 24. The previous data did not  
get
 better, it even had a decrease to 11% which can be an interesting topic for a future investigation.