Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

In recent years, the increasing number of science discoveries conduct in life-nature science and chemical biology fields require more subject experiments. The subject can vary from human to animal, however, animals are being the main favorite to replace human tester seeing it from safety factor. It becomes the main issue in society as some individuals argue that animals are needed to be protected as well. The result is many online petitions or even lawsuits against some companies who use animals as experiment tester. This essay will elaborate more on that argument and given alternatives solutions. The more extreme the experiments, the higher possibility of scientist’s tendency to pick animals as trials. Animals such as hare, mice, pigeon, or even monkeys which are believed to resemble human body reactions, are most common in chemical-compounds related testing. The worst that can occur is death or permanent injuries, foremost in cosmetic industries, mice and hare as the tester of new products. One of the main failures is the allergy of certain chemicals towards animals or a higher level of dangerous ingredients if any. Fortunately, the law of animal protection in these such industries have been released, thus, companies who infringe the rules can be sued beside the damaged reputation in front of society and several petitions. To be frank, various ways can be taken as alternatives for stopping this act, in order to reduce animal cruelty. One of many among them is replacing animals as a subject tester or even stop this method. Another way, the researcher can lower the level of chemical ingredients that can lead to more natural product-based. Those ways can prevent the damage of severe experiment failure on both animals and humans. To put it simply, a protection law for animals as subject experiments exist today so that lawsuit against animal cruelty can be done in addition of petitions. Further, the other ways to prevent this case happens, companies freely replace animals or even stop picking them as part of the trial instead. Selecting natural based products as core ingredients rather than chemical compounds.
In recent years, the increasing number of science discoveries conduct in life-nature science and
chemical
biology fields require more
subject
experiments
. The
subject
can vary from human to
animal
,
however
,
animals
are being the main favorite to replace human
tester
seeing it from safety factor. It becomes the main issue in society as
some
individuals argue that
animals
are needed
to
be protected
as well
. The result is
many
online petitions or even lawsuits against
some
companies
who
use
animals
as
experiment
tester
. This essay will elaborate more on that argument and
given
alternatives solutions.

The more extreme the
experiments
, the higher possibility of scientist’s tendency to pick
animals
as trials.
Animals
such as hare, mice, pigeon, or even monkeys which
are believed
to resemble human body reactions, are most common in chemical-compounds related testing. The worst that can occur is death or permanent injuries, foremost in cosmetic industries, mice and hare as the
tester
of new products. One of the main failures is the allergy of certain
chemicals
towards
animals
or a higher level of
dangerous
ingredients if any.
Fortunately
, the law of
animal
protection in these such industries have
been released
,
thus
,
companies
who infringe the
rules
can
be sued
beside the damaged reputation in front of society and several petitions.

To be frank, various
ways
can
be taken
as alternatives for stopping this act, in order to
reduce
animal
cruelty. One of
many
among them is replacing
animals
as a
subject
tester
or even
stop
this method. Another
way
, the researcher can lower the level of
chemical
ingredients that can lead to more natural product-based. Those
ways
can
prevent
the
damage of
severe
experiment
failure on both
animals
and humans.

To put it
simply
, a protection law for
animals
as
subject
experiments
exist
today
so
that lawsuit against
animal
cruelty can
be done
in addition
of petitions.
Further
, the other
ways
to
prevent
this case happens,
companies
freely
replace
animals
or even
stop
picking them as part of the trial
instead
. Selecting natural based products as core ingredients
rather
than
chemical
compounds.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
345 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts