Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Both the reading and the lecture are talking about cons and prof of letting the people work only four days per week.

Both the reading and the lecture are talking about cons and prof of letting the people work only four days per week. n6eEP
Both the reading and the lecture are talking about cons and prof of letting the people work only four days per week. The passage states that this will benefit the companies and the employees as wee. It gives three reasons to support this idea. However, the lecture opposes the statement made in the reading part. It says that working four days in a week will bot benefit the companies. To begin with, the author of the reading says that if the individuals will work only four days, they be more productive because they will feel less tired. He claims that the company can hire more people in order to reach the same amount of work. This particular reason, is challenged by the professor of the lecture. He said that, if they work less days the company will be forced to hire new people, and this will cost more to the employeers. He said hiring new people is costly, they will need to mpay for training and health benefits. He said the health benefits remain the same either if you work four days or five days. Moreover, adding more people means more office space and more computers. Furthermore, the reading part supports the idea that the country will benefit as well, because it will reduce the unemployment rates. It says that more jibs will be available where individuals can apply. Yet, the listening part disputes this idea. It says that reducing the work days does not allow more jobs available. It says that because it is so costly to get new workers, the companies may ask the people to work overtime to reach their goals. Finally, the author of the passage says that the employees will have more time to spend with their families and have better quality of life. On the other hand the lecturer said that more free time will increase the risk that employees will reduce their quality of work. Also, they will be the first to loose their jobs in the economy cutdown.
Both the
reading
and the lecture are talking about cons and prof of letting the
people
work
only
four days per week. The passage states that this will
benefit
the
companies
and the employees as wee. It gives three reasons to support this
idea
.
However
, the lecture opposes the statement made in the
reading
part. It
says
that working four days in a week will bot
benefit
the
companies
.

To
begin
with, the author of the
reading
says
that if the individuals will
work
only
four days, they be more productive
because
they will feel less tired. He claims that the
company
can hire more
people
in order to reach the same amount of
work
. This particular reason,
is challenged
by the professor of the lecture. He said that, if they
work
less
days the
company
will
be forced
to hire new
people
, and this will cost more to the
employeers
. He said hiring new
people
is
costly, they will need to
mpay
for training and health
benefits
.
He
said the health
benefits
remain the same either if you
work
four days or five days.
Moreover
, adding more
people
means
more office space and more computers.

Furthermore
, the
reading
part supports the
idea
that the country will
benefit
as well
,
because
it will
reduce
the unemployment rates. It
says
that more jibs will be available where individuals can apply.
Yet
, the listening part disputes this
idea
. It
says
that reducing the
work
days does not
allow
more jobs available. It
says
that
because
it is
so
costly to
get
new workers, the
companies
may ask the
people
to
work
overtime to reach their goals.

Finally
, the author of the passage
says
that the employees will have more time to spend with their families and have better quality of life.
On the other hand
the lecturer said that more free time will increase the
risk
that employees will
reduce
their quality of
work
.
Also
, they will be the
first
to
loose
their jobs in the economy
cutdown
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Both the reading and the lecture are talking about cons and prof of letting the people work only four days per week.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
336 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 6band
    water salinity
    Both the reading and the lecture talk about ways to reduce the salinity from the lake in order to save the fish population. The reading proposes three ways that can help desalinate the lake's water. However, the lecture disputes the ideas given in the passage. The professor said that it will be grea...
  • 5.5band
    Having children is less important than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples
    It is undeniable that having kids is a blessing for evryone. Personally, I believe that the children play cruical role in our lives. I feel this way for several reasons which I will explore in the following essay. To begin with, children are the ones that makes us feel alive. When you have kids, yo...
  • 6band
    people should spend money on things that are long lasting like jewerly rather than in personal short lived pleasures like traveling
    It is critically importat that we know how to manage our budget in order for us to live a happy live. I am of the opinion that people should invest more in things that last longer. I hold this idea for some reasons that I will elaborate in the following essay. To begin with, stocking expensive good...
  • 6band
    Smartphones have caused more harm than good in our society
    There is not doubt that we live in an era where using the technology is unevitable. Smartphones are one of the most devices people use nowadays and they have been tremendously helpful for everyone. I feel this way some some reasons that I will explore in the following essay. To begin with, mobile p...
  • 5.5band
    Driveless cars
    The reading and the lecture are both about driveless cars. The author of the article feels that is a huge improvement in society having this car. The lecture disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that it won't bring any beneffits. According to the reading driveless cars can be ...
  • 6band
    Endotherms dinossaurs
    The reading and the lecture are both about if dinossaurs were endotherms. The author of article feels that dinossaurs differ in many ways from reptiles. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that there is not enough arguments proving dinosaurs are endotherms. Accordi...





Get more results for topic: