There is no doubt that, animals are illegally being hunted for foods food (plural of food is food since it is an uncountable noun. ) and decorative purposes in many parts of the world, and to protect them from hunters, governments spend huge sums of money. Eventhough I largely agree that governments should prioritise this money to solve the issues of humans such as poverty and health care, I believe that the state has the responsibility to protect animal species to a certain extent.
Admittedly, the primary responsibility of every government is to fullfill the fundamental rights of its citizens such as food, cloth, health care (Connect such as with fundamental rights. Moreover, food is not a fundamental right, … is to fulfil the fundamental rights such as right to healthy food of its citizens. ). There are many people in our country who are deprived of food and unable to access the quality health care. Furthermore, unfortunately, poverty and health care is are closely interconnected. This is because, when a member from a destitute family will become gets (use simple present tense) injured or ill, the entire household will ultimately ends up with low income and high health care costs. For instance, the WHO’s World Health Organisation’s statistics in the last year showed that the infant mortality rate and nutritional deficiency disease was higher in low income families than in affluent ones. That is why, many people favour that government should allocate its budget to give preference to mitigate the social evils such as poverty and famine rather than protection of animals.
In addition to alleviate alleviating this these social issues, I believe that governments have the responsibility to protect its flora and fauna along with their natural habitat. To elaborate, we are unaware that a vast number of animal and plant species are dwindling in number due to poaching and human encroachment (be specific and leave no vagueness) other reasons. Consequently, they are at the verge of extinction, and thus leading (are THEY leading to loss of biodiversity. Use a word that refers to “the verge of extinction”) this leads to loss of biodiversity which is essential for healthy and functional ecosystem. Moreover, these plant and animal species are vitally important to prevent epidemics and to protect the public from diseases. For example, a lot of vaccines are derived from the chemicals produced by animals. Therefore, wildlife conservation programmes and management of financial resource for animal protections also need attention.
In conclusion, it is believed by some that animal protection campaigns and programmes are given wide preferences by authorities. Despite I widely strongly believe that a government should bestow more importance to the health and poverty of its citizens, however governments practices to protect the endangered species should not be underrated.
There is no doubt that,
animals
are
illegally
being hunted
for
foods
food
(plural of
food
is
food
since it is an uncountable noun.
)
and decorative purposes in
many
parts of the world, and to
protect
them from hunters,
governments
spend huge sums of money.
Eventhough
I
largely
agree
that
governments
should
prioritise
this money to solve the issues of humans such as
poverty
and
health
care
, I believe that the state has the responsibility to
protect
animal
species to a certain extent.
Admittedly
, the primary responsibility of every
government
is to
fullfill
the
fundamental
rights
of its citizens such as
food
, cloth,
health
care
(Connect such as with
fundamental
rights
.
Moreover
,
food
is not a
fundamental
right
, … is to fulfil the
fundamental
rights
such as
right
to healthy
food
of its citizens.
)
. There are
many
people
in our country who
are deprived
of
food
and unable to access the quality
health
care
.
Furthermore
, unfortunately,
poverty
and
health
care
is are
closely
interconnected. This is
because
, when a member from a destitute family will become
gets
(
use
simple present tense) injured or ill, the entire household will
ultimately
ends
up with low income and high
health
care
costs.
For instance
, the WHO’s World
Health
Organisation
’s statistics in the last year
showed
that the infant mortality rate and nutritional deficiency disease was higher in low income families than in affluent ones.
That is
why,
many
people
favour
that
government
should allocate its budget to give preference to mitigate the social evils such as
poverty
and famine
rather
than protection of animals.
In addition
to alleviate alleviating this these social issues, I believe that
governments
have the responsibility to
protect
its flora and fauna along with their natural habitat. To elaborate, we are unaware that a vast number of
animal
and plant species are dwindling in number due to poaching and human encroachment (be specific and
leave
no vagueness) other reasons.
Consequently
, they are at the verge of extinction, and
thus
leading (are THEY leading to loss of biodiversity.
Use
a word that refers to “the verge of extinction”) this leads to loss of biodiversity which is essential for healthy and functional ecosystem.
Moreover
, these plant and
animal
species are
vitally
important
to
prevent
epidemics and to
protect
the public from diseases.
For example
,
a lot of
vaccines
are derived
from the chemicals produced by
animals
.
Therefore
, wildlife conservation
programmes
and management of financial resource for
animal
protections
also
need attention.
In conclusion
, it
is believed
by
some
that
animal
protection campaigns and
programmes
are
given
wide preferences by authorities. Despite I
widely
strongly
believe that a
government
should bestow more importance to the
health
and
poverty
of its citizens,
however
governments
practices to
protect
the endangered species should not
be underrated
.