The argument talks about the reallocation of resources from space research to exploration of our oceans. The author assumes that ocean plays
the central role between the two as it is known for its global transportation, food production and climate. However the evidence provided omits some
Important concern needed to substantiate the argument. This alone does not constitute a logical argument in favour of the resource shift, and it
certainly does not provide support or proof of the argument.
First and foremost, the author’s assumption that oceans play the major role between the two researches is questionable.
He fails to consider the plausibility that the presence of moon on Earth is very vital because it helps stabilise the planet through its
Moderate climate. And also the moon’s gravitational pull is responsible for the tidal force in ocean’s which provides us information
on high tides and low tides.
Furthermore, The argument is more constrained by the words that oceans play the central role because it is responsible for climate, transportation
But, moon is the only natural satellite to earth and tells us about the time, tides and light which are considered factors before
making any sort of transportation through oceans study of climate would help us smoothen the process.
Because the author leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive. If it included the items discussed above instead of solely
Explaining the reallocation of resources from surface of moon, the argument would have been more convincing and thorough.
The
argument
talks about the reallocation of resources from space research to exploration of our
oceans
. The author assumes that
ocean
plays
the
central role between the two as it
is known
for its global transportation, food production and
climate
.
However
the evidence provided omits
some
Important
concern needed to substantiate the
argument
. This alone does not constitute a logical
argument
in
favour
of the resource shift, and
it
certainly
does not provide support or proof of the argument.
First
and foremost, the author’s assumption that
oceans
play the major role between the two researches is questionable.
He fails to consider the plausibility that the presence of moon on Earth is
very
vital
because
it
helps
stabilise
the planet through its
Moderate
climate
. And
also
the moon’s gravitational pull is responsible for the tidal force in
ocean’s
which provides us information
on high tides and low tides.
Furthermore
, The
argument
is more constrained by the words that
oceans
play the central role
because
it is responsible for
climate
, transportation
But
, moon is the
only
natural satellite to earth and
tells
us about the time, tides and light which
are considered
factors
before
making
any sort of transportation through
oceans
study of
climate
would
help
us smoothen the process.
Because
the author
leaves
out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive. If it included the items discussed above
instead
of
solely
Explaining the reallocation of resources from surface of moon, the
argument
would have been more convincing and thorough.