In the recent years, there has been a drastic increase in media coverage regarding
private celebrity lives. While some people believe that privacy invasion is the cost of
being famous others disagree and believe that media does not treat the celebrities
right. In this essay, I will discuss both point of views and lend my partial support to
the latter argument.
Being famous comes with responsibility and the media holds people accountable.
Sometimes fame gained in a very short period of time can make people feel invincible
and arrogant. For instance, a famous actor in India, Salman Khan, who became
popular after 3 movies at the age of seventeen, was involved in a drunk driving
incident in which a few people lost their lives. The actor was released because of his
influence in the industry, however, it was the media coverage which assured that the
case went to tria. If there was no media to keep a check on celebrities, the power
would fall more in the hands of people who are famous.
On the other hand, the media has its own low points during its coverage. For
instance, the accident during which Princess Diana lost her life while she was
attempting to ward of photographers. Moreover, the media also seems to feed on
the lowest points in a person’s life like Britney Spears’ meltdown which did not have
any impact on society, but rather it was used to make a mockery of the star.
Furthermore, it is also important to consider that there is a young vulnerable
population reading material published by the media which in return also influences
how they think and form opinions. Hence, the media needs to be more responsible
about its coverage.
In conclusion while the coverage of celebrity’s private life by the media can help keep
celebrities in check, monetizing someone else’s sadness and mocking someone
suffering from a mental health condition is inhumane. Hence, I believe that the
coverage of the private life of celebrities should be more restricted and should only be
published if the story can have a potentially positive impact on the society.
In the recent years, there has been a drastic increase in
media
coverage
regarding
private
celebrity
lives
.
While
some
people
believe that privacy invasion is the cost
of
being
famous
others disagree and believe that
media
does not treat the celebrities
right
. In this essay, I will discuss both point of views and lend my partial support
to
the
latter argument.
Being
famous
comes
with responsibility and the
media
holds
people
accountable.
Sometimes
fame gained in a
very
short period of time can
make
people
feel invincible
and
arrogant.
For instance
, a
famous
actor in India, Salman Khan, who
became
popular after 3 movies at the age of seventeen,
was involved
in a drunk driving
incident
in which a few
people
lost their
lives
. The actor
was released
because
of
his
influence in the industry,
however
, it was the
media
coverage
which assured that the
case
went to
tria
. If there was no
media
to
keep
a
check
on
celebrities
, the
power
would
fall more in the hands of
people
who are
famous
.
On the other hand
, the
media
has its
own
low points during its
coverage
. For
instance, the accident during which Princess Diana lost her
life
while she was
attempting
to ward of photographers.
Moreover
, the
media
also
seems to feed on
the lowest points in a person’s
life
like Britney Spears’ meltdown which did not have
any
impact on society,
but
rather
it was
used
to
make
a mockery of the star.
Furthermore
, it is
also
important
to consider that there is a young vulnerable
population reading material published by the
media
which in return
also
influences
how
they
think
and form opinions.
Hence
, the
media
needs to be more responsible
about
its coverage.
In conclusion
while the
coverage
of
celebrity’s
private
life
by the
media
can
help
keep
celebrities in
check
, monetizing someone else’s sadness and mocking someone
suffering
from a mental health condition is inhumane.
Hence
, I believe that the
coverage of the private
life
of
celebrities
should be more restricted and should
only
be
published
if the story can have a
potentially
positive
impact on the society.