During the course of social development, the leaders’ decisive plays an indispensable role in achieving or even the prosperity of the public. It is generally believed that any leader, who can be susceptible to the changes from popular opinion, is more likely to have limited accomplishments. Personally, I completely disagree with this view because of the detailed explanations below.
Primarily, some people argue that leaders are representatives of the vast majority of voters, which means that their decisions reflect the needs and aspirations of massive individuals. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted point of view. Individual, who is a leader, is expected to make legitimate decisions based on their intellectual ability and practical experience. For instance, Vietnam successfully prevented Covid-19 pandemic due to strict quarantine regulation from Vietnam’s authorities, which most people used to oppose. This example, asserts that leaders’ decision has a profound impact on the public life.
From my perspective, leaders cannot totally obey popular opinions, but should strike a balance between popular opinions and all other concerns. Thus, leaders can consult widely and openly among their communities to ensure that their decisions are extremely comprehensive. Besides, maintaining their ideas also alleviate the difficulties that leaders have to face in order to satisfy people who have differing views. If they identified the most priority issues in their society, they would make feasible decisions. This leads to these considerable improvements, might not only for their society, but their own as well.
In conclusion, leaders can integrate their intellectual with the public’s voice to guarantee the benefits of the public, which considered as charisma leaders.
During the course of social development, the
leaders’
decisive plays an indispensable role in achieving or even the prosperity of the
public
. It is
generally
believed that any
leader
, who can be susceptible to the
changes
from popular opinion, is more likely to have limited accomplishments.
Personally
, I completely disagree with this view
because
of the detailed explanations below.
Primarily
,
some
people
argue that
leaders
are representatives of the vast majority of voters, which means that their
decisions
reflect the needs and aspirations of massive individuals.
However
, I believe this to be a
very
shortsighted point of view. Individual, who is a
leader
, is
expected
to
make
legitimate
decisions
based on their intellectual ability and practical experience.
For instance
, Vietnam
successfully
prevented
Covid-19 pandemic due to strict quarantine regulation from Vietnam’s authorities, which most
people
used
to oppose. This example, asserts that
leaders’
decision
has a profound impact on the
public
life.
From my perspective,
leaders
cannot
totally
obey popular opinions,
but
should strike a balance between popular opinions and all other concerns.
Thus
,
leaders
can consult
widely
and
openly
among their communities to ensure that their
decisions
are
extremely
comprehensive.
Besides
, maintaining their
ideas
also
alleviate the difficulties that
leaders
have to
face in order to satisfy
people
who have differing views. If they identified the most priority issues in their society, they would
make
feasible
decisions
. This leads to these considerable improvements, might not
only
for their society,
but
their
own
as well
.
In conclusion
,
leaders
can integrate their intellectual with the
public’s
voice to guarantee the benefits of the
public
, which considered as charisma
leaders
.