Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Animal experimentation such as medicines, shampoo, and cosmetic is a topic that is frequently discussed these days, particularly in the media. According to many people, animals should not be used in testing because it is cruel and unnecessary.

Animal experimentation such as medicines, shampoo, and cosmetic is a topic that is frequently discussed these days, particularly in the media. According to many people, animals should not be used in testing because it is cruel and unnecessary. From my point of view, the arguments for and against animal testing are going to be analyzed in the following essay. The author’s opinion is clear. She agrees with the topic question: she accepts the opinion that animals should not be used in testing and she also mentions the reasons for her argument. The IELTS exam only tests your ability, not your opinion. So you can either agree, disagree or partly agree with the question. first of all, people who oppose these experiments argue that we must do animal testing. For example, many well-known life-saving medicines were created in this manner and animal studies may help us uncover additional therapies in the future. Indeed, possibly even a cure for cancer and AIDS. Furthermore, the animals involved are not typically wild but are bred specifically for research purposes. As a result, they believe it is incorrect that animal experiments are to blame for the reduction in the number of wild animals on the plan. On the other hand, there are good arguments against this. Animal experiments are cruel and inflict significant agony on animals. Furthermore, they believe that many experiments are unnecessary, animals are used not only to test new medications but also new cosmetics, which might be evaluated on people instead. Another issue is that occasionally experiments on animals provide incorrect results since the bodies of animals are not equivalent to our own. As a result, this testing may not provide the safety that its supporters promise. In conclusion, owing to the aforementioned perspective, despite the fact that animal testing has shown that the benefits exceed the drawbacks, animal experimentation should be discontinued. Although it may improve the lives of people, it is unfair and unjust to subject animals to suffering in order to do this.

You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
Animal
 experimentation such as medicines, shampoo, and cosmetic is a topic that is
frequently
 discussed these days, particularly
 in the media. According to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should not be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtesttrialexaminationmeasurementverification
testing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 it is cruel and unnecessary. From my point of view, the arguments for and against You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtesttrialexaminationmeasurementverification
testing
 are going to be analyzed
 in the following essay.

The author’s opinion is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
. She This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesces
agrees
 with the topic question: she accepts the opinion that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should not be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 in Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).testing, and
testing and
 she also
 mentions the reasons for her argument.

The IELTS exam This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluates
tests
 your ability, not your opinion. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
 you can either This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
, disagree or partly This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with the question.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".first
first of all
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 who oppose these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsearchprobeattemptobservationundertakingstudy
experiments
 argue that we This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 do You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtesttrialexaminationmeasurementverification
testing
. For example
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 well-known life-saving medicines were created
 in this manner and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 studies may This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 us uncover additional therapies in the future. Indeed
, possibly
 even a cure for cancer and AIDS. Furthermore
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 involved are not typically
 wild This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
are bred
specifically
 for research purposes. As a result
, they believe it is incorrect that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsearchprobeattemptobservationundertakingstudy
experiments
 are to blame for the reduction in the number of wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 on the plan.

On the other hand
, there are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 arguments against this. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
Animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsearchprobeattemptobservationundertakingstudy
experiments
 are cruel and inflict significant agony on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. Furthermore
, they believe that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsearchprobeattemptobservationundertakingstudy
experiments
 are unnecessary, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluate
test
 new medications This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 new cosmetics, which might be evaluated
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
instead
. Another issue is that occasionally
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsearchprobeattemptobservationundertakingstudy
experiments
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 provide incorrect results since the bodies of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are not equivalent to our This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
. As a result
, this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtesttrialexaminationmeasurementverification
testing
 may not provide the safety that its supporters promise.

In conclusion
, owing to the aforementioned perspective, despite the fact that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtesttrialexaminationmeasurementverification
testing
 has shown that the benefits exceed the drawbacks, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 experimentation should be discontinued
. Although it may This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorate
improve
 the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
, it is unfair and unjust to subject You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 to suffering in order to do this. 