The author proposed that by shutting down the small plant and to build a large plant in the Grandview location. The author considers that the workers have earned less wage and largest population of the location are adult. However, the proposal contains some critical flaws and will not be accepted if it fails to answer some assumption. Moreover, the assumption will help to draw an accurate conclusion and finally reject the untruth assumption.
The first problematic issue is the author assume the Grandview location as an ideal location of the new plant without any firm evidence. Another is, samll plant is proposed to shut down and build a new plant but the author did not consider the cost involving with the plant establishment. Moreover, closing of the samll plant and build another plant is a prolong time but the proposal does not contain any information related to it.
The second issue is in the Grandview location largest population are adult but my question, is the worker ready to work for the plant? The author assumes that they are ready for the work which is quite unreasonable. Moreover, the wage of the worker is low does not mean that worker will be agreed to work with the same wage.
The third problem is the author only calculate the availability of the worker and the wage but another cost involving the plant is not considered like the raw material, transportation cost and electric charges etc. Finally, author epressed that tax will not be paid for the plant for three years. It may be possible that, other location has more benefit like tax will not pay for five years. In the proposal there is no evidence.
While the overall hypotesis is quite interesting but will not validate further because of lack of information. The proposal
will be accepted if the alreday referred weakness is removed and answer all the assumption accurately.
The
author
proposed that by shutting down the
small
plant
and to build a large
plant
in the Grandview
location
. The
author
considers that the
workers
have earned less wage and largest population of the
location
are adult.
However
, the proposal contains
some
critical flaws and will not be
accepted
if it fails to answer
some
assumption.
Moreover
, the assumption will
help
to draw an accurate conclusion and
finally
reject the untruth assumption.
The
first
problematic issue is the
author
assume the Grandview
location
as an ideal
location
of the new
plant
without any firm evidence. Another is,
samll
plant
is proposed
to shut down and build a new
plant
but
the
author
did not consider the cost involving with the
plant
establishment.
Moreover
, closing of the
samll
plant
and build another
plant
is
a prolong
time
but
the proposal does not contain any information related to it.
The second issue is in the Grandview
location
largest
population are adult
but
my question, is the
worker
ready to work for the
plant
? The
author
assumes that they are ready for the work which is quite unreasonable.
Moreover
, the wage of the
worker
is low does not mean that
worker
will be
agreed
to work with the same wage.
The third problem is the
author
only
calculate the availability of the
worker
and the wage
but
another cost involving the
plant
is not considered like the raw material, transportation cost and electric charges etc.
Finally
,
author
epressed
that tax will not
be paid
for the
plant
for three years. It may be possible that, other
location
has more benefit like tax will not pay for five years. In the proposal there is no evidence.
While the
overall
hypotesis
is quite interesting
but
will not validate
further
because
of lack of information. The
proposal
will
be
accepted
if the
alreday
referred weakness
is removed
and answer all the assumption
accurately
.