In the present world, the usage of technology is constantly on the rise. Even classrooms are among the many places that enjoy the usage and benefits of automation. It is disagreed that classroom teachers will be totally substituted for machinery. Analysing the incapability of disciplining study room students with technology, as well as the limitation in the learning process of students taught with machinery will prove our views.
In the first view, a robotic teacher made with artificial intelligence would lack sufficient control over its study hall students. Namely, it is widely known that kids need to be thoroughly watched by their teachers to be sure that they take their class works seriously and do not fool around when classes are going on. Sadly, for the above mentioned task robotic teachers will be incapable of carrying out. Then, it makes it clear that debate room teachers will never be totally substituted for computers.
In another point, the learning process of students would be disrupted if they are taught by robotic teachers, which may slow down some students’ ability to comprehend information taught in lessons. For example, kids love to be motivated before lessons are taught effectively. This is a quality that many human teachers have but robotic teachers do not have. Therefore, it becomes apparent that human teachers will never be replaced with robotic teachers in a lecture room.
To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Thus, it is clear that the idea of running a study hall completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over machinery-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.
In the present world, the usage of technology is
constantly
on the rise. Even classrooms are among the
many
places that enjoy the usage and benefits of automation. It
is disagreed
that classroom
teachers
will be
totally
substituted for machinery.
Analysing
the incapability of disciplining study room
students
with technology,
as well
as the limitation in the learning process of
students
taught with machinery will prove our views.
In the
first
view, a
robotic
teacher
made with artificial intelligence would lack sufficient control over its study hall
students
.
Namely
, it is
widely
known that kids need to be
thoroughly
watched
by their
teachers
to be sure that they take their
class
works
seriously
and do not fool around when classes are going on.
Sadly
, for the above mentioned task
robotic
teachers
will be incapable of carrying out. Then, it
makes
it
clear
that debate room
teachers
will never be
totally
substituted for computers.
In another point, the learning process of
students
would
be disrupted
if they
are taught
by
robotic
teachers
, which may slow down
some
students’
ability to comprehend information taught in lessons.
For example
, kids
love
to
be motivated
before
lessons
are taught
effectively
. This is a quality that
many
human
teachers
have
but
robotic
teachers
do not have.
Therefore
, it becomes apparent that human
teachers
will never
be replaced
with
robotic
teachers
in a lecture room.
To summarize
, a
robotic
teacher
does not have the necessary disciple to
properly
give instructions to
students
and actually works to retard the ability of a
student
to comprehend new lessons.
Thus
, it is
clear
that the
idea
of running a study hall completely by a machine cannot
be supported
. After thorough analysis on this subject, it
is predicted
that the adverse effects of the debate over machinery-driven teaching will always be greater than the
positive
effects, and
because of this
, classroom
teachers
will never
be substituted
for technology.