Although some people value public parks, this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever- growing population or to develop business or boost economies. To what extent do you agree with this? v.1
Although some people value public parks, this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever- growing population or to develop business or boost economies. v. 1
It is argued by many people that instead of establishing public parks, these areas can be used for construction of residential buildings for the ever-increasing population or the operation of trade matters and the improvement of economies. While I agree that public parks provide people with relaxation and amusement, erection of housing estates can be a better alternative where people can enjoy parks as well as develop businesses.
To begin, public parks can be considered a form of recreation for people at any age whilst they can be an essential source of oxygen. Today, most public parks serve various entertainment facilities for both children and adults which are highly appreciated by many people. Furthermore, due to the fast-growing industrialization a number of trees are cut down for commercial issues. From this perspective, the foundation of public parks which are full of various kinds of trees can mitigate some environmental problems such as air pollution by absorbing carbon dioxide in the air.
On the other hand, a segment of people believes that because of the population growth people are in need of more spaces to live in. To address this issue, residential complexes can be constructed by business people who want to boost their business, besides, residents can take advantage of recreational amenities, particularly, parks inside of these housing estates. Moreover, these contemporary buildings are considerably larger in size, thus the lack of residential areas cannot be a problematic issue anymore.
To conclude, it is undeniable that public parks provide people with a lot of recreational facilities. However, establishment of the housing estates may be a reasonable option which is beneficial to both residents and business people.
It
is argued
by
many
people
that
instead
of establishing
public
parks
, these areas can be
used
for construction of residential buildings for the ever-increasing population or the operation of trade matters and the improvement of economies. While I
agree
that
public
parks
provide
people
with relaxation and amusement, erection of housing estates can be a better alternative where
people
can enjoy
parks
as well
as develop businesses.
To
begin
,
public
parks
can
be considered
a form of recreation for
people
at any age whilst they can be an essential source of oxygen.
Today
, most
public
parks
serve various entertainment facilities for both children and adults which are
highly
appreciated by
many
people
.
Furthermore
, due to the
fast
-growing industrialization a number of trees are
cut
down for commercial issues. From this perspective, the foundation of
public
parks
which are full of various kinds of trees can mitigate
some
environmental problems such as air pollution by absorbing carbon dioxide in the air.
On the other hand
, a segment of
people
believes that
because
of the population growth
people
are in need of more spaces to
live
in. To address this issue, residential complexes can
be constructed
by business
people
who want to boost their business,
besides
, residents can take advantage of recreational amenities,
particularly
,
parks
inside of
these housing estates.
Moreover
, these contemporary buildings are
considerably
larger in size
,
thus
the lack of residential areas cannot be a problematic issue anymore.
To conclude
, it is undeniable that
public
parks
provide
people
with
a lot of
recreational facilities.
However
, establishment of the housing estates may be a reasonable option which is beneficial to both residents and business
people
.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes