It is argued that exploiting public parks for economical advancement and accommodation is more fruitful rather than keeping empty for people. To a certain extent, I disagree with the idea of repurposing the public parks. However, I also think that these spaces can be useful for housing and developing business in a society.
Public parks can be both operational and economical. It has ample spaces, which could offer housings for the rising population in a community. For example, in Bangladesh, there are many public spaces in Dhaka city are occupied with apartment complex to meet the rising demographic demand. In addition, these places can utilize on developing business such as shopping complex to trigger the economical growth. This commercial use could open many job opportunities and resolve unemployment issue. This means that it might be another source of tax for the government budget. Therefore, replacing public parks with residential areas and business can bring the quality of living and economical developments of a country.
However, I would argue that public parks should not be emerged for the above functions. Public parks can ensure the healthy living of a community. It allows elder people to carry out different activities which are rejuvenating after a day’s hard work. It also helps us to live near the nature, and children can play games and sports which might keep them active and energetic. A recent BBC documentary shows that in Japan, visiting Park for 15minutes in a day can improve the human body immune system which is preventive for depression. Thus, parks have greater value to keep fit our physical and mental well being.
In conclusion, it seems that keeping public parks is more significant rather than utilising for business and housing of a country.
It
is argued
that exploiting
public
parks
for
economical
advancement and accommodation is more fruitful
rather
than keeping empty for
people
. To a certain extent, I disagree with the
idea
of repurposing the
public
parks
.
However
, I
also
think
that these spaces can be useful for housing and developing
business
in a society.
Public
parks
can be both operational and
economical
. It has ample spaces, which could offer housings for the rising population in a community.
For example
, in Bangladesh, there are
many
public
spaces in Dhaka city
are occupied
with apartment complex to
meet
the rising demographic demand.
In addition
, these places can utilize on developing
business
such as shopping complex to trigger the
economical
growth. This commercial
use
could open
many
job opportunities and resolve unemployment issue. This means that it might be another source of tax for the
government
budget.
Therefore
, replacing
public
parks
with residential areas and
business
can bring the quality of living and
economical
developments of a country.
However
, I would argue that
public
parks
should not
be emerged
for the above functions.
Public
parks
can ensure the healthy living of a community. It
allows
elder
people
to carry out
different
activities which are rejuvenating after a day’s
hard
work. It
also
helps
us to
live
near the nature, and children can play games and sports which might
keep
them active and energetic. A recent BBC documentary
shows
that in Japan, visiting
Park
for 15minutes in a day can
improve
the human body immune system which is preventive for depression.
Thus
,
parks
have greater value to
keep
fit our physical and mental
well being
.
In conclusion
, it seems that keeping
public
parks
is more significant
rather
than
utilising
for
business
and housing of a country.