The urban population around the world is increasing at an astonishing rate and this trend has put a strain on social resources. Some people suggest that public parks in cities should be converted to business or residential areas to meet the growing need for land. I completely disagree with this point of view.
Green areas in cities play an important role in maintaining people’s health. To begin with, trees and other plants in public parks can absorb carbon dioxide and other chemicals in the air and this helps to provide better air quality for everyone living / everyone who lives in the city. This improvement can be crucial for those people who are suffering from breathing disorders because of the deteriorating air pollution. Another reason to maintain public parks is that they make a good place for people to exercise and stay fit. Regular exercise helps people build a stronger body, boost their immune system and thus protect them from catching the illness.
Moreover, gardens and parks can make cities more visually appealing. If our cities were only filled with skyscrapers, residential areas and business districts, our lives would be dull and bored; whereas the trees and flowers can make our lives more colourful and bring people closer to the nature.
Finally, I would argue that building residential apartments and business centre is not a real option to address the issues brought by urban expansion. In my opinion, a better solution is that the governments should start to build more satellite centres outside already crowded downtown areas. This would not only provide more employment opportunities in suburban areas and boost economic growth, but also relieves the pollution and traffic problems in cities.
To conclude, I strongly believe that public parks in the cities should be reserved as it is beneficial to both citizens and civic landscape. To deal with the growing needs for land use, governments should take other measures such building more suburb centres.
The urban population around the world is increasing at an astonishing rate and this trend has put a strain on social resources.
Some
people
suggest that
public
parks
in
cities
should
be converted
to business or residential
areas
to
meet
the growing need for land. I completely disagree with this point of view.
Green
areas
in
cities
play an
important
role in maintaining
people’s
health. To
begin
with, trees and other plants in
public
parks
can absorb carbon dioxide and other chemicals in the air and this
helps
to provide better air quality for everyone living / everyone who
lives
in the city. This improvement can be crucial for those
people
who are suffering from breathing disorders
because
of the deteriorating air pollution. Another reason to maintain
public
parks
is that they
make
a
good
place for
people
to exercise and stay fit. Regular exercise
helps
people
build a stronger body, boost their immune system and
thus
protect them from catching the illness.
Moreover
, gardens and
parks
can
make
cities
more
visually
appealing. If our
cities
were
only
filled with skyscrapers, residential
areas
and business districts, our
lives
would be dull and bored; whereas the trees and flowers can
make
our
lives
more
colourful
and bring
people
closer to the nature.
Finally
, I would argue that building residential apartments and business
centre
is not a real option to address the issues brought by urban expansion. In my opinion, a better solution is that the
governments
should
start
to build more satellite
centres
outside already crowded downtown
areas
. This would not
only
provide more employment opportunities in suburban
areas
and boost economic growth,
but
also
relieves the pollution and traffic problems in cities.
To conclude
, I
strongly
believe that
public
parks
in the
cities
should
be reserved
as it is beneficial to both citizens and civic landscape. To deal with the growing needs for land
use
,
governments
should take other measures such building more suburb
centres
.