Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

actors earn more money nowadays,some people agree with that and the other are not .discuss both points of view

actors earn more money nowadays, some people agree with that and the other are not. discuss both points of view qV0Pd
Even though recreation has been a considerable part of citizens` lives, it has become a highly contentious issue in the modern world. Whilst one school of thought argues that celebrities have adversely affected the community; therefore, the government should not give them a massive amount of money, others have an opposite view. Personally, I am utterly convinced that entertainers should be paid much because of their positive impacts on the individuals. To begin with, not only have comedians distortedthe conception of entertainment, but also they have been responsible for wasting adolescents` time on following TV programs that do not have moral lessons. In other words, comparing to the past, entertainers were introducing a plethora of comic serials in a civilized way without any ridicule, yet it is apparent that entertainment has drastically changed because today`s amusing series are full of mockery which have influenced the audience`s ethics in a negative way. This has been further supported by an article, entitled " The Effects of TV Shows", published in " The Guardian" Magazine which substantiated that the principal reason behind the bullying phenomenon at schools is the comic shows because of the children`s profound ability of mimicking what they are watching. This prime example exhibits that makers of delight do not deserve to be paid for promulgating such notions. Furthermore, rather than stimulating the public to read or exercise in their leisure time, they are motivated to squander hours using social media platforms. Hence, individuals have to draw attention to heighten their intellect. On the other hand, despite the view above, many people and I are of the belief that these comedians should be received monetary support, for they are responsible for amusing the public and honing their health. To illustrate, employees require free time for comfort and relaxation after spending an excessive number of hours at work. Therefore, watching a comic telecast would have utmost importance as they will retrieve their strength and concentration so that they can endeavor to work. Moreover, mental and physical amelioration are inextricably linked to laughter. For instance, as per a research study conducted by Faculty of Medicine, Harvard University, laughing has a pivotal role in boosting health as it reduces the potential of having heart stroke by 88%. Hence it is advised that each individual should dedicate at least one hour for amusement if he seeks excellent health. In conclusion, having presented both points of view, it can be reiterated that some opponents claim that celebrities have a negative impact on the audience, whereas proponents conceive that allocating financial support to advocate entertainers` role is a must. I embrace the second view because this will supplement pleasure as well as welfare to the life.
Even though
recreation has been a considerable part of citizens`
lives
, it has become a
highly
contentious issue in the modern world. Whilst one school of
thought
argues that celebrities have
adversely
affected
the community;
therefore
, the
government
should not give them a massive amount of money, others have an opposite
view
.
Personally
, I am
utterly
convinced that entertainers should
be paid
much
because
of their
positive
impacts on the individuals.

To
begin
with, not
only
have comedians
distortedthe
conception of entertainment,
but
also
they have been responsible for wasting adolescents` time on following TV programs that do not have moral lessons.
In other words
, comparing to the past, entertainers were introducing a plethora of comic serials
in a civilized way
without any ridicule,
yet
it is apparent that entertainment has
drastically
changed
because
today`s
amusing series are full of mockery which have influenced the
audience`s
ethics in a
negative
way. This has been
further
supported by an article, entitled
"
The Effects of TV
Shows
"
, published in
"
The Guardian
"
Magazine which substantiated that the principal reason behind the bullying phenomenon at schools is the comic
shows
because
of the
children`s
profound ability of mimicking what they are watching. This prime example exhibits that makers of delight do not deserve to
be paid
for promulgating such notions.
Furthermore
,
rather
than stimulating the public to read or exercise in their leisure time, they
are motivated
to squander hours using social media platforms.
Hence
, individuals
have to
draw attention to heighten their intellect.

On the other hand
, despite the
view
above,
many
people
and I are of the belief that these comedians should
be received
monetary support, for they are responsible for amusing the public and honing their health. To illustrate, employees require free time for comfort and relaxation after spending an excessive number of hours at work.
Therefore
, watching a comic telecast would have utmost importance as they will retrieve their strength and concentration
so
that they can endeavor to work.
Moreover
, mental and physical amelioration are
inextricably
linked to laughter.
For instance
, as per a research study conducted by Faculty of Medicine, Harvard University, laughing has a pivotal role in boosting health as it
reduces
the potential of having heart stroke by 88%.
Hence
it
is advised
that each individual should dedicate at least one hour for amusement if he seeks excellent health.

In conclusion
, having presented both points of
view
, it can
be reiterated
that
some
opponents claim that celebrities have a
negative
impact on the audience, whereas proponents conceive that allocating financial support to advocate entertainers` role is a
must
. I embrace the second
view
because
this will supplement pleasure
as well
as welfare to the life.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay actors earn more money nowadays, some people agree with that and the other are not. discuss both points of view

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
450 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: