Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. XgNr

Some people believe that animals should be treated in the same way humans are and have similar rights, whereas others think that it is more important to use them as we desire for food and medical research. This essay will discuss both points of view. With regard to the exploitation of animals, people believe it is acceptable for several reasons. Firstly, they think that humans are the most important beings on the planet, and everything must be done to ensure human survival. If this means experimenting on animals so that we can fight and find cures for diseases, then this takes priority over animal suffering. Furthermore, it is believed by some that animals do not feel pain or loss as humans do, so if we have to kill animals for food or other uses, then this is morally acceptable.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 believe that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should be treated
in the same way
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 are and have similar rights, whereas others This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that it is more This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 them as we desire for food and medical research. This essay will discuss both points of view.

With regard to the exploitation of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 believe it is acceptable for several reasons. Firstly
, they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 are the most This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 beings on the planet, and everything This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
be done
 to ensure You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 survival. If this means experimenting on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 that we can fight and find cures for diseases, then this takes priority over You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 suffering. Furthermore
, it is believed
 by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 do not feel pain or loss as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 do, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 if we This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 kill You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 for food or other This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploits
uses
, then this is morally
 acceptable. 