Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion NB8d

There is no doubt that animal exploitation by humans has increased over the years. Though some people believe that animals can be extensivelyused for their own benefits, I would agree with those, who argue that animals too should have similar democracyas individuals. This essay will explore the both sides of the argument. On one hand, people who believe in animal utilization, encourage the fact that creatures are meant to be used for food and experiments. This is because, according to them eating animals is a part of natural food cycle. Moreover, experimenting on animals is much easier as they are more manageable, and cannot ask for consent explicitly. For example, researching on a rat for some science test is quiet smooth than on humans, since they are tiny and do cannot defend themselves. On the other hand, humans have the ability to voice out for their freedom and it is officially marked as their birth right, however, animals cannot do the same, so it does not mean they are not liable for these rights. For instance, there are constitutions for masses which states their entitlement for different privileges. Conversely, if animal race could express their feelings, they would have asked for their right over their existence too. In my view, it is imperative to respect every existing living things as nobody has the right to own the other beings. Although consuming animals, there are alternatives to this, such as, meat-eaters turning into vegetarians. In addition to this, advance science should find a substitute for using animals in science examinations. In conclusion, despite various benefits and dependencies on animal usage, it is my firm belief that animals must be provided liberty as equally as human beings.

There is no doubt that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 exploitation by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 has increased over the years. Though This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 believe that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 can be Possible spelling mistake found.extensively used
extensivelyused
 for their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 benefits, I would This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with those, who argue that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 too should have similar Possible spelling mistake found.democracy as
democracyas
 individuals. This essay will explore the both sides of the argument.

On one hand, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 who believe in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 utilization, encourage the fact that creatures are meant
 to be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for food and experiments. This is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
, according to them eating You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 is a part of natural food cycle. Moreover
, experimenting on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 is much easier as they are more manageable, and cannot This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :solicitrequest
ask for
 consent explicitly
. For example
, researching on a rat for This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
Did you mean "sciences"?sciences
science
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluate
test
 is Did you mean "quite"? 'quiet' means 'silent', 'quite' mean 'very' or 'to a moderate extent'quite
quiet
Use "smoother" to make a comparison with this adjective.smoother
smooth
 than on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
, since they are tiny and do cannot defend themselves.

On the other hand
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 have the ability to voice out for their freedom and it is officially
 marked as their birth You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgoodlegalhonestappropriatelegitimateproper
right
, however
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 cannot do the same, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 it does not mean they are not liable for these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withclaimlicensebusinesspowerfreedomauthority
rights
. For instance
, there are constitutions for masses which states their entitlement for This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 privileges. Conversely
, if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 race could express their feelings, they would have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :solicitedrequested
asked for
 their This phrase is redundant. Consider using "over".over
right over
 their existence too.

In my view, it is imperative to respect every existing living things as nobody has the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgoodlegalhonestappropriatelegitimateproper
right
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 the other beings. Although consuming You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
, there are alternatives to this, such as, meat-eaters turning into vegetarians. In addition
 to this, advance science should find a substitute for using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in science examinations.

In conclusion
, despite various benefits and dependencies on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 usage, it is my firm belief that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
be provided
 liberty as Use either "equally" or "as" on its own. When comparing two nouns, use "just as".equallyasjust as
equally as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 beings. 