A healthy and balanced society requires a symbiotic relationship between citizens and the government. The government looks after citizens from the taxes it collects. However, a pertinent question is often asked- who should pay which taxes, and should one be required to pay taxes for services he does not avail of. For instance, how fair is it to require citizens to pay taxes for government education, when their children do not avail of these facilities and actually attend private school?
After all there in no denying the fact that parents sending their children to private schools are anyway burdened with the higher fees they charge. As these schools have their own stipulations for uniform, books and activities, the cost of attendance to these schools is radically higher than their government counterpart. In effect, asking such parents to pay taxes for universal education is like making someone pays to construct a park he never visits.
However, one does not need to go very far to see that this argument does not hold water. Firstly, when one pays taxes, one is not directly paying for services he or she uses. The government collects taxes from various sources and then decides in which area to spend the money and who its beneficiaries will be. For example, the government may tax a rich hotel or an entrepreneur to fun supply of water to a village. Secondly, this very same person may be using a disproportionate amount of some other government service for which he pays less tax. For instance, he may be using more of the road than another person, but paying the same tax. Thus, basic nature of the taxation system flies in the face of this argument.
The ethical angle of the argument proposed must also be considered. A person whose family does not take the benefit of universal education may be rich enough to send his children to a costlier private school. The very idea of taxation is to have a more egalitarian society, which is achieved by taxing the rich and serving the poor. The argument may be made for the old and the retired people, who do not avail of universal education. However, one must remember that governments around the world are careful to impose less taxes on such people anyway. For example, such people may be paying less or no income tax. Specifically targeting taxes which finance government school appears, not only to be out of line, but also un-ethical.
A healthy and balanced society requires a symbiotic relationship between citizens and the
government
. The
government
looks after citizens from the
taxes
it collects.
However
, a pertinent question is
often
asked- who should
pay
which
taxes
, and should one
be required
to
pay
taxes
for services he
does
not avail of.
For instance
, how
fair
is it to require citizens to
pay
taxes
for
government
education
, when their children do not avail of these facilities and actually attend private school?
After
all there in no denying the fact that parents sending their children to private
schools
are anyway burdened with the higher fees they charge. As these
schools
have their
own
stipulations for uniform, books and activities, the cost of attendance to these
schools
is
radically
higher than their
government
counterpart. In effect, asking such parents to
pay
taxes
for universal
education
is like making someone
pays
to construct a park he never visits.
However
, one
does
not need to go
very
far to
see
that this argument
does
not hold water.
Firstly
, when one
pays
taxes
, one is not
directly
paying for services he or she
uses
. The
government
collects
taxes
from various sources and then decides in which area to spend the money and who its beneficiaries will be.
For example
, the
government
may
tax
a rich hotel or an entrepreneur to fun supply of water to a village.
Secondly
, this
very
same person may be using a disproportionate amount of
some
other
government
service for which he
pays
less
tax
.
For instance
, he may be using more of the road than another person,
but
paying the same
tax
.
Thus
, basic nature of the taxation system flies in the face of this argument.
The ethical angle of the argument proposed
must
also
be considered
. A person whose family
does
not take the benefit of universal
education
may be rich
enough
to
send
his children to a costlier private
school
. The
very
idea
of taxation is to have a more egalitarian society, which
is achieved
by taxing the rich and serving the poor. The argument may
be made
for the
old
and the retired
people
, who do not avail of universal
education
.
However
, one
must
remember that
governments
around the world are careful to impose less
taxes
on such
people
anyway.
For example
, such
people
may be paying less or no income
tax
.
Specifically
targeting
taxes
which finance
government
school
appears, not
only
to be out of line,
but
also
un-ethical
.