Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Economic development always harms the environment. It is impossible for a country to both develop the economy and protect the environment at the same time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Economic development always harms the environment. It is impossible for a country to both develop the economy and protect the environment at the same time. awlQw
Constructive evolution of the country may have a detrimental impact on the ecosystem. It is argued that the growth of society and securing the earth is not possible simultaneously. I strongly disagree with this notion as with the technology in place, we can achieve both paradigms together plus the oath taken by world powers to protect an environment is vital in this area. The mother earth has given a lot to its children. While planning for an evolution of the place, we need to consider protecting the health of our atmosphere. The majority of industries development had been taken place with the use of electricity which gets created with the consumption of wood and coal. Now, we are aware that immense pollution can be caused by the use of these resources. Henceforth, the majority of nations are now opting to recycle way of creating power such as solar energy and wind energy. For instance, Germany is the first country that has made this possible by developing electricity with the help of these renewable resources which has reduced the pollution level by 70%. Hence, the ecosystem can be protected alongside with continuous development. Along with this, the global community has already declared a clean-green revolution. Almost all developed and developing countries are abided by this revolution which clearly states the use of green and clean energy for the development of the resources. And in case, any nation fails to follow the law then they need to face the consequences laid down by the UN. For example, South Korea and Iran had already been banned from nuclear experiments further as these countries fail to meet the bare minimum parameter of this law and also adversely affected the atmosphere. In conclusion, it is debatable that the clean ecosystem and continues growth of the region is not realistic. As I disagree with this view because of the fact that with the help of technology solutions and global powers commitment towards the green evolution, we can easily achieve a great deal of modernization with minimal or no impact on the earth.
Constructive evolution of the
country
may have a detrimental impact on the ecosystem. It
is argued
that the growth of society and securing the earth is not possible
simultaneously
. I
strongly
disagree with this notion as with the technology in place, we can achieve both paradigms together plus the oath taken by world powers to protect an environment is vital in this area.

The mother earth has
given
a lot to its children. While planning for an evolution of the place, we need to consider protecting the health of our atmosphere. The majority of industries development had
been taken
place with the
use
of electricity which
gets
created with the consumption of wood and coal.
Now
, we are aware that immense pollution can
be caused
by the
use
of these resources. Henceforth, the majority of nations are
now
opting to recycle way of creating power such as solar energy and wind energy.
For instance
, Germany is the
first
country
that has made this possible by developing electricity with the
help
of these renewable resources which has
reduced
the pollution level by 70%.
Hence
, the ecosystem can
be protected
alongside with continuous development.

Along with this, the global community has already declared a clean-green revolution. Almost all developed and developing
countries
are abided
by this revolution which
clearly
states the
use
of green and clean energy for the development of the resources. And in case, any nation fails to follow the law then they need to face the consequences laid down by the UN.
For example
, South Korea and Iran had already
been banned
from nuclear experiments
further
as these
countries
fail to
meet
the bare minimum parameter of this law and
also
adversely
affected
the atmosphere.

In conclusion
, it is debatable that the clean ecosystem and continues growth of the region is not realistic. As I disagree with this view
because of the fact that
with the
help
of technology solutions and global powers commitment towards the green evolution, we can
easily
achieve a great deal of modernization with minimal or no impact on the earth.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Economic development always harms the environment. It is impossible for a country to both develop the economy and protect the environment at the same time.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
346 words
9
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 9.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 9.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 9.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 9.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts