One of the controversial issues today is whether several people argue that in many circles of developing countries that funds ought to be consumed to assist in the usage of cycles in cities which can have a positive impact on the health of citizens as well as on the environment, while there are others who are with the view that finances ought to be spent on public transport. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and provide my overall opinion.
Generally speaking, there is a wide range of reasons why people believe that bicycles are a better option for cities. Perhaps the main reason why people are in favor of this idea is that riding a bicycle for work reduces dependency on other transport modes such as bus, car, or motorbike. Therefore, it will reduce the demand for fuel-consuming vehicles on the roads, as the results carbon footprint, global warming, and air pollution would be reduced to a great extent. For instance, France and Belgium are famous for their city bicycle riding paths.
Despite these arguments, there is also a case for the idea that public transport can be advantageous. The main reason why people think that this is a good idea is that it is impossible to go everywhere by bicycle. We need a good public transport system to reach the far away and difficult places, usually when there are good and efficient public transport system people would not use their own or private vehicles. For example, forty people can be accommodated on a bus without any problem, whereas for forty cars we need more space. Investing in public transport is really valued development. Most of the developed countries successfully used this strategy to ease traffic jams in major towns.
To conclude, both arguments have their merits. In my humble opinion, public transport is one of the important aspects of transport and traveling whose funding cannot be overlooked.
One of the controversial issues
today
is whether several
people
argue that in
many
circles of
developing countries
that funds ought to
be consumed
to assist in the usage of cycles in cities which can have a
positive
impact on the health of citizens
as well
as on the environment, while there are others who are with the view that finances ought to
be spent
on
public
transport
. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and provide my
overall
opinion.
Generally
speaking, there is a wide range of reasons why
people
believe that
bicycles
are a better option for cities. Perhaps the main reason why
people
are in favor of this
idea
is that riding a
bicycle
for work
reduces
dependency on other
transport
modes such as bus, car, or motorbike.
Therefore
, it will
reduce
the demand for fuel-consuming vehicles on the roads, as the results carbon footprint, global warming, and air pollution would be
reduced
to a great extent.
For instance
, France and Belgium are
famous
for their city
bicycle
riding paths.
Despite these arguments, there is
also
a case for the
idea
that
public
transport
can be advantageous. The main reason why
people
think
that this is a
good
idea
is that it is impossible to go everywhere by
bicycle
. We need a
good
public
transport
system to reach the far away and difficult places,
usually
when there are
good
and efficient
public
transport
system
people
would not
use
their
own
or private vehicles.
For example
, forty
people
can
be accommodated
on a bus without any problem, whereas for forty cars we need more space. Investing in
public
transport
is
really
valued development. Most of the
developed countries
successfully
used
this strategy to
ease
traffic jams in major towns.
To conclude
, both arguments have their merits. In my humble opinion,
public
transport
is one of the
important
aspects of
transport
and traveling whose funding cannot
be overlooked
.